The Executive Yuan has allocated NT$20 billion (US$641.64 million) for enhancing digital education in elementary and junior-high schools over the next four years.
The “Internet for All Classes, A Tablet for Every Student” plan seeks to enable children to study more effectively. The plan has received significant media coverage, with focus on hardware improvement at schools and teachers’ readiness.
However, parents are fundamental to the success of digital education.
In the past few years, government agencies and non-governmental organizations have made every effort to develop and improve e-learning platforms.
The government’s Taiwan Adaptive Learning Platform and the privately owned Junyi Academy are free for students, and each has its own merits in promoting digital education.
In theory, these platforms could solve some problems, particularly in rural areas where there are no after-school centers or cram schools. With these platforms, students are able to learn by themselves.
However, the platforms are not widely used.
First, children’s eyesight is a cause of concern for parents. When children use a tablet computer, a laptop or other electronic devices at home, it is hard for them to follow the “30/10” rule of 30 minutes device use and 10 minutes rest.
At the same time, parents have found the e-learning platforms difficult to use. The design of reward and feedback systems, as well as recording and playback functions, on these platforms needs improvement.
After parents experienced online teaching during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the hardware most of them have at home should meet the needs of e-learning platforms, so the main focus should be improving the platforms.
For instance, there should be a function that forces users to take a 10-minute break every 30 minutes — or even have the computer automatically shut down.
There should also be a function that prevents users from surfing the Internet. That way, parents would not have to worry about their children’s eyesight.
Parental education
According to my research, parents seldom use e-learning platforms with their children, because they do not know whether the platforms are beneficial to their children’s performance in school.
About half of parents whose children are in elementary and junior-high school wonder whether using technology truly helps their children.
The other half, who usually have their children use e-learning platforms, recognize that their children’s education have become less of a financial burden and less time-consuming.
Some people say that when children use the Internet, parents play on their smartphones.
However, if that was truly the case, it would be meaningless for parents to accompany their children while studying, otherwise children might lose motivation to study or even end up playing on their phones, just like their parents.
The digital education plan is well-intentioned, and it corresponds well with the most commonly accepted principles of learning.
However, after a few years of practice, it is obvious that parents need to be educated and the existing platforms must be improved.
In so doing, the platforms would perform much better in schools and at home, and help children achieve the goals of self-learning.
Liu Yung-chien is an elementary-school principal.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS