Every generation thinks it has it harder than anyone else, but Generation Z — the young people who are graduating from college and entering the labor market — might actually have a point.
A few months ago, I saw a Twitter post from a professor who wrote that when he taught in Lebanon, at the American University of Beirut, one of his students complained that her parents “have no idea how complicated and stressful the world has become.”
When he pointed out that her parents had lived through the Lebanese Civil War, she said: “Yeah, but we have like the Internet and stuff.”
It sounds absurd, but Gen Z actually does have it harder than previous generations — even if not on par with a violent civil war. Their college and high-school lives were rocked by the COVID-19 pandemic and now, just as they are trying to get their careers going, they are entering an uncertain economy in which a recession is likely. These two experiences can have a lasting impact. Graduating during a recession can mean lower earnings for decades, and a COVID-19-dominated college term robbed them of important socialization and the chance to learn how to manage their time and interact with adults.
Thriving in today’s economy is still possible, but to do so, young people will need to let go of the idea that they have been taught from birth that the world is unforgiving and allows no room for mistakes.
It is understandable why they feel that way. Everything we do is captured for prosperity on social media and judged in real time by our peers. The economy itself feels much more high-stakes, with a tiered system driven by a few successful companies that pay people very well and provide a good professional network.
So if you do not get on that train early, go to the right school, get a job at the right company, you are doomed to a lackluster career.
Their parents and grandparents had the luxury of acting like idiots in their immature youth without leaving a permanent public record of it. If you did not get into the right school — or go to college at all — you could still get a good job.
Each generation seems more anxious and pressured than the previous one.
A survey found that half of respondents aged 24 to 39 (millennials) had left work roles at least partly for mental health reasons, and that rose to 75 percent for people aged 18 to 24, compared with 20 percent of the general population. Other surveys also showed fear of failure and high rates of anxiety.
However, the idea that you cannot fail at anything if you want to be successful is a damaging myth. The world still does offer second, third and even fifth chances, and the more risks you take, the more you learn and the more likely you are to succeed.
There are legitimate reasons to think the economy is harder and less forgiving, but worrying is becoming a vicious cycle. No wonder the younger generation is less rebellious than previous generations — it seems like there is no margin for error. They are less likely to experiment with drugs or alcohol, have sex or drive. They also spend much more time with their parents.
However, the lack of rebellion and experimentation might be fueling their anxiety and belief that setbacks are catastrophic.
Vassar College psychology professor Abigail Baird has said that taking risks as a teenager is an important part of brain development. Testing limits and experiencing setbacks trains your brain to cope with risks and bad outcomes when you get older. If you miss out on this experience, taking risks would be harder as you age.
As more Gen Zers join the workforce in the coming years, they can still thrive if they can let go of the idea that they might never recover from early mistakes. We do not say it enough, but your first job is not your destiny, and even if a looming recession makes it harder to find your dream job, economic slowdowns can also be a time of new entrepreneurship and reorganization.
We often hear terrifying statistics about people who are underemployed (and underpaid), or recent college graduates who are forced to take jobs that do not even require a degree, but those early-stage anecdotes do not capture that graduates tend to have better overall career trajectories. They eventually end up in a better job or advance much faster in the job they have. They also have much lower rates of unemployment, even in a recession.
Careers are the product of a lifetime of experience, and as long as you are learning something, any job is worthwhile. When you stop learning, rather than mentally checking out on the job, just move on.
The best careers often feature many setbacks, including layoffs, firings and trying out different jobs that do not fit. In other words, people make mistakes and find themselves in the wrong place, so then they move on.
Contrary to popular perception, young people do not change jobs more than previous generations. Changing jobs is how wages traditionally grow and often how your career advances.
While technology can be a burden, it also opens up possibilities. It is much easier to connect with new people or stay in touch with old colleagues to build a network that can help you find your next job.
I am optimistic that Gen Z will find a way to buck the trend of increased risk aversion. The current economy is making it clear that there are no guarantees, even if you do everything right. Many companies that were supposed to be that golden ticket — big banks and tech firms — are laying off workers or calling hiring freezes.
COVID-19 disruptions dealt young graduates a huge setback and lots of disappointment, but it also required them to adapt with technology, and do it quickly. There was certainly damage done, but perhaps that experience will also leave Gen Z better equipped to deal with whatever shocks the job market throws at them.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS