Every generation thinks it has it harder than anyone else, but Generation Z — the young people who are graduating from college and entering the labor market — might actually have a point.
A few months ago, I saw a Twitter post from a professor who wrote that when he taught in Lebanon, at the American University of Beirut, one of his students complained that her parents “have no idea how complicated and stressful the world has become.”
When he pointed out that her parents had lived through the Lebanese Civil War, she said: “Yeah, but we have like the Internet and stuff.”
It sounds absurd, but Gen Z actually does have it harder than previous generations — even if not on par with a violent civil war. Their college and high-school lives were rocked by the COVID-19 pandemic and now, just as they are trying to get their careers going, they are entering an uncertain economy in which a recession is likely. These two experiences can have a lasting impact. Graduating during a recession can mean lower earnings for decades, and a COVID-19-dominated college term robbed them of important socialization and the chance to learn how to manage their time and interact with adults.
Thriving in today’s economy is still possible, but to do so, young people will need to let go of the idea that they have been taught from birth that the world is unforgiving and allows no room for mistakes.
It is understandable why they feel that way. Everything we do is captured for prosperity on social media and judged in real time by our peers. The economy itself feels much more high-stakes, with a tiered system driven by a few successful companies that pay people very well and provide a good professional network.
So if you do not get on that train early, go to the right school, get a job at the right company, you are doomed to a lackluster career.
Their parents and grandparents had the luxury of acting like idiots in their immature youth without leaving a permanent public record of it. If you did not get into the right school — or go to college at all — you could still get a good job.
Each generation seems more anxious and pressured than the previous one.
A survey found that half of respondents aged 24 to 39 (millennials) had left work roles at least partly for mental health reasons, and that rose to 75 percent for people aged 18 to 24, compared with 20 percent of the general population. Other surveys also showed fear of failure and high rates of anxiety.
However, the idea that you cannot fail at anything if you want to be successful is a damaging myth. The world still does offer second, third and even fifth chances, and the more risks you take, the more you learn and the more likely you are to succeed.
There are legitimate reasons to think the economy is harder and less forgiving, but worrying is becoming a vicious cycle. No wonder the younger generation is less rebellious than previous generations — it seems like there is no margin for error. They are less likely to experiment with drugs or alcohol, have sex or drive. They also spend much more time with their parents.
However, the lack of rebellion and experimentation might be fueling their anxiety and belief that setbacks are catastrophic.
Vassar College psychology professor Abigail Baird has said that taking risks as a teenager is an important part of brain development. Testing limits and experiencing setbacks trains your brain to cope with risks and bad outcomes when you get older. If you miss out on this experience, taking risks would be harder as you age.
As more Gen Zers join the workforce in the coming years, they can still thrive if they can let go of the idea that they might never recover from early mistakes. We do not say it enough, but your first job is not your destiny, and even if a looming recession makes it harder to find your dream job, economic slowdowns can also be a time of new entrepreneurship and reorganization.
We often hear terrifying statistics about people who are underemployed (and underpaid), or recent college graduates who are forced to take jobs that do not even require a degree, but those early-stage anecdotes do not capture that graduates tend to have better overall career trajectories. They eventually end up in a better job or advance much faster in the job they have. They also have much lower rates of unemployment, even in a recession.
Careers are the product of a lifetime of experience, and as long as you are learning something, any job is worthwhile. When you stop learning, rather than mentally checking out on the job, just move on.
The best careers often feature many setbacks, including layoffs, firings and trying out different jobs that do not fit. In other words, people make mistakes and find themselves in the wrong place, so then they move on.
Contrary to popular perception, young people do not change jobs more than previous generations. Changing jobs is how wages traditionally grow and often how your career advances.
While technology can be a burden, it also opens up possibilities. It is much easier to connect with new people or stay in touch with old colleagues to build a network that can help you find your next job.
I am optimistic that Gen Z will find a way to buck the trend of increased risk aversion. The current economy is making it clear that there are no guarantees, even if you do everything right. Many companies that were supposed to be that golden ticket — big banks and tech firms — are laying off workers or calling hiring freezes.
COVID-19 disruptions dealt young graduates a huge setback and lots of disappointment, but it also required them to adapt with technology, and do it quickly. There was certainly damage done, but perhaps that experience will also leave Gen Z better equipped to deal with whatever shocks the job market throws at them.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS