To argue his case for a new constitution (“Taiwan needs a new constitution,” Nov. 16, page 8), Fu Jen Catholic University assistant professor Yao Meng-chang (姚孟昌) cited Remembrance Day — Nov. 11 — which in the West commemorates those who died fighting since World War I.
Although Remembrance Day is unofficially observed in Hong Kong — a holdover from British rule — it is not observed in Taiwan, where by all rights it should be.
Many Republic of China (ROC) citizens lost their lives as part of the Chinese Labor Corps supporting the Allies in Europe during the war.
Unfortunately, in spite of the protest of the ROC delegation to the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, then-US president Woodrow Wilson and the Allies gave the Shandong Peninsula — the birthplace of Confucius (孔子) — to Japan.
As a result of this geopolitical decision, the ROC government, which later fled to Taiwan, refused to sign the Treaty of Versailles.
RESENTING THE WEST
Furthermore, the perceived insult infuriated Chinese against the West and it ignited the May Fourth Movement, which Mao Zedong (毛澤東) 20 years later cited as the dawn of communist China.
Although the “Shandong problem” was resolved to China’s satisfaction in 1921, the ROC still refuses to recognize Remembrance Day, preferring instead to forget those in the Chinese Labor Corps who died fighting in a war supposedly meant “to make the world safe for democracy.”
Yao argued for a new constitution by comparing Taiwan’s situation to that of the then-British colonies in North America at the time of the American Revolution, when dissidents and rebels fought for independence against the colonial troops.
Yao’s comparison is apt, but not for the reasons he cites.
What was to become the US at the time was still an alliance of geographically linked colonies — not states — populated by diverse “refugees” primarily from England.
King George III oppressively held the colonies as part of the British Empire and regarded their declaration of independence as an act of sedition.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the oppressive “king” of China, feels the same way about Taiwan.
That Taiwan is a breakaway province — or colony — populated by dissidents and descendants of refugees from China after the Chinese Civil War.
Similarly, Xi would consider a new Taiwanese constitution a provocation fueled by the same “foreign barbarians” who once stole the Shandong Peninsula from China.
However, just as the US’ population in 1776 no longer considered themselves British, Taiwanese no longer consider themselves Chinese.
In this sense, Yao is right, Taiwan needs a new constitution that recognizes the preferred identity of its people by disposing of the name ROC.
After all, the US did not call itself the “Republic of British Colonies.”
RISK OF WAR
Unfortunately, Yao is also right that a new constitution could demand Taiwanese to sacrifice their lives in a defensive war over their sovereignty and democracy.
Should such a war come to pass, one can only hope that a new “Taiwanese Remembrance Day” would follow.
If it does, it would mean freedom and democracy had prevailed over another assault by an oppressive cadre of criminals calling itself a government.
Xue Meng-ren is an adjunct associate professor at Chaoyang University of Technology.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS