With eight days to go before the local elections on Saturday next week, the spotlight is on the Hsinchu City mayoral race involving three candidates: Lin Keng-jen (林耕仁) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Shen Hui-hung (沈慧虹) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Kao had a comfortable lead in the polls early in the race, followed by Shen and Lin.
However, Kao’s image and popularity crumbled after an avalanche of allegations over the past few months. She first had to defend herself against accusations that she had plagiarized two studies she had coauthored for her doctoral dissertation.
Later, she was accused of receiving wages from the government-linked Institute for Information Industry while studying for her doctorate in the US.
The tensions came to a head when a whistle-blower accused her of fraudulently collecting expenses for her legislative assistants and asking them to “donate” their overtime pay into a “provident fund.”
A leaked ledger showed that Kao spent the money on personal shopping.
Kao has denied any wrongdoing, while Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is the TPP’s chairman, spoke up for her by saying that “it is only human to make mistakes.”
The impact of the allegations has been reflected in Kao’s dropping poll numbers, as the accusations depict a corrupt, abusive and power-hungry politician as opposed to the fresh, crisp image that she had created for herself.
In a wider sense, Kao is the opposite of what the TPP says it stands for, as it has vowed to stamp out corruption, privilege and exploitation.
Kao was unapologetic for her elitist and condescending remarks against former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) and even belittled Lin Keng-jen by saying that his “winning chances are next to nil.”
In theory, no city would welcome a candidate like Kao.
However, Hsinchu has a tradition of supporting politicians not affiliated with the KMT or the DPP, making it a fertile ground for a third party like the TPP.
On a deeper level, the city has a soft spot for elites. As a large percentage of its residents are wealthy and successful — such as engineers working at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co — Kao’s experience might have reminded them of their former selves. This might explain why Kao resonated with Hsinchu residents.
Before his resignation, former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien was celebrated for introducing urban aesthetics to Hsinchu, such as by restoring the Hsinchu Public Library and the city’s zoo, and launching art festivals.
In contrast to Shen, who has an unadorned yet diligent image, Kao falls closer in line with Lin Chih-chien’s cosmopolitanism and urbanism in terms of image and vision.
Kao has had a great deal of luck by finding herself in a city like Hsinchu, where the DPP is still recovering from a plagiarism controversy involving Lin Chih-chien, and the KMT is fielding a candidate who is far too weak to be a force to be reckoned with.
It remains to be seen whether Kao has indeed run out of luck.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS