With eight days to go before the local elections on Saturday next week, the spotlight is on the Hsinchu City mayoral race involving three candidates: Lin Keng-jen (林耕仁) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Shen Hui-hung (沈慧虹) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Kao had a comfortable lead in the polls early in the race, followed by Shen and Lin.
However, Kao’s image and popularity crumbled after an avalanche of allegations over the past few months. She first had to defend herself against accusations that she had plagiarized two studies she had coauthored for her doctoral dissertation.
Later, she was accused of receiving wages from the government-linked Institute for Information Industry while studying for her doctorate in the US.
The tensions came to a head when a whistle-blower accused her of fraudulently collecting expenses for her legislative assistants and asking them to “donate” their overtime pay into a “provident fund.”
A leaked ledger showed that Kao spent the money on personal shopping.
Kao has denied any wrongdoing, while Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is the TPP’s chairman, spoke up for her by saying that “it is only human to make mistakes.”
The impact of the allegations has been reflected in Kao’s dropping poll numbers, as the accusations depict a corrupt, abusive and power-hungry politician as opposed to the fresh, crisp image that she had created for herself.
In a wider sense, Kao is the opposite of what the TPP says it stands for, as it has vowed to stamp out corruption, privilege and exploitation.
Kao was unapologetic for her elitist and condescending remarks against former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) and even belittled Lin Keng-jen by saying that his “winning chances are next to nil.”
In theory, no city would welcome a candidate like Kao.
However, Hsinchu has a tradition of supporting politicians not affiliated with the KMT or the DPP, making it a fertile ground for a third party like the TPP.
On a deeper level, the city has a soft spot for elites. As a large percentage of its residents are wealthy and successful — such as engineers working at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co — Kao’s experience might have reminded them of their former selves. This might explain why Kao resonated with Hsinchu residents.
Before his resignation, former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien was celebrated for introducing urban aesthetics to Hsinchu, such as by restoring the Hsinchu Public Library and the city’s zoo, and launching art festivals.
In contrast to Shen, who has an unadorned yet diligent image, Kao falls closer in line with Lin Chih-chien’s cosmopolitanism and urbanism in terms of image and vision.
Kao has had a great deal of luck by finding herself in a city like Hsinchu, where the DPP is still recovering from a plagiarism controversy involving Lin Chih-chien, and the KMT is fielding a candidate who is far too weak to be a force to be reckoned with.
It remains to be seen whether Kao has indeed run out of luck.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS