The three major candidates running for Taipei mayor in the Nov. 26 local elections — Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安), former minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) of the Democratic Progressive Party and independent former Taipei deputy mayor Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) — faced off in a SET-TV and TVBS debate on Saturday last week.
Throughout the debate, there were a few stammers and slips of the tongue from all three, presumably due to nerves. When the TVBS representative asked the candidates if they would “promise not to run for a second term” if they failed to carry out their own social housing policy, they all shunned the question.
In the order of each candidates’ turn in the debate, I would like to review their performances.
Chiang started off by talking about properties in Taipei being the oldest in the nation, with an average age of more than 30 years, followed by the issue of sub-replacement fertility and lastly acknowledging the services provided by people from all walks of life, especially delivery drivers, during the COVID-19 pandemic. He ended his speech by directing seven questions at Chen.
Chiang’s performance was fairly decent, and some might even argue that it exceeded expectations. Compared with Chen and Huang, Chiang was able to deliver his speech without glancing at his notes most of the time, while his gestures reflected confidence and preparedness.
His only flaw was his evasion of Chen’s remark regarding “strategic voting,” a proposal put forward by Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). Jaw had proposed that anti-DPP supporters should all vote for Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), who is running for Hsinchu mayor, in exchange for allowing Chiang to be elected as Taipei mayor. As it was a veritable hot potato, Chiang had little choice but to try to sidestep the question.
Chen adopted President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “safeguard Taiwan, resist China” strategy in a wider sense.
He started his speech by questioning Chiang’s ancestry and national identity, and then made the creative move of inviting Chiang and Huang to watch the movie Untold Herstory (流麻溝十五號) now showing in theaters. Appealing to people’s hearts, he emphasized that it pained him to think of the lives lost to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Basically, Chen’s strategy has worked in consolidating the DPP’s “iron votes,” but he erred when coming under attack from Chiang and Huang, as he did not offer detailed explanations in response to their criticisms and remarks.
Huang told the viewers that she aspires to be the first female Taipei mayor. She positioned herself as a third option, presenting people with the choice of not getting caught between the DPP and the KMT, and their antagonism.
From the perspective of local borough wardens and appreciative residents, she said that she is the only candidate who is “ready to go” — the one who is most familiar with municipal affairs due to her experience as the deputy mayor.
She also drew supporters’ attention to the fact that she has neither a prestigious background nor the support of a political party.
Huang’s strategy could be said to have incorporated a defense and an attack. The only flaw was that she could not evade criticism about failing to solve the traffic problems in Nangang (南港) and Neihu (內湖) districts when she worked as a Taipei city councilor for those districts.
Hu Wen-chi is former vice chairman of the KMT’s Culture and Communications Committee.
Translated by Rita Wang
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,