During an interview in Canada on Friday last week. 28, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that “China is becoming more aggressive toward Taiwan, a region where maritime trade accounts for 50 percent of daily global trade, and where most of the chips needed for cell phones and other goods are made in Taiwan,” and that “a crisis in the Taiwan Strait would be bad for the world, so security in the strait must be maintained.”
It was the third time that Blinken mentioned the importance of Taiwan’s chips to the global economy, following an ABC interview and a conversation with former US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice.
The international community views Taiwan as having two global advantages that are irreplaceable by any other country:
The first is Taiwan’s strategic position. From the US perspective of its global strategic deployment, Taiwan, surrounded by sea on all sides, is in the center of the “first island chain.” It faces the Taiwan Strait and the Bashi Channel, both important international waters that control the main sea routes of Taiwan, China, Japan, South Korea and the Philippines.
If a war breaks out across the strait, a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) blockade of Taiwan’s maritime shipping routes — which the large military exercises around Taiwan in August seemed to be in preparation for — would not only choke the country’s economic and trade activities, and war supplies, but also affect maritime traffic safety and benefits for other Asia-Pacific countries. Not to mention that it would threaten the US’ overall interests in the Indo-Pacific region.
Second is the importance of Taiwan’s chip technology. Chris Miller — a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and the author of a new book, Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology — has said that Taiwan is the “beating heart” of the global semiconductor industry and that if its semiconductor industry were destroyed, the total global economic loss would be greater than the losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The international status of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry can be attributed to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Data from Taiwanese market research firm TrendForce Corp show that the revenue of Taiwan’s chip foundry accounted for more than 60 percent of global chip foundries in 2020, with TSMC accounting for 54 percent of the total.
Taiwanese chips have become “strategic materials” that are no less important than oil. The world’s telecommunications infrastructure and advanced weapons systems, and artificial intelligence, network systems, smartphones and self-driving vehicles all rely on advanced chips.
From Taiwan’s geostrategic significance and its mass production of high-end chips, a cross-strait war would be a “global chip war.”
As TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) warned during an interview with CBS’ 60 Minutes: “If there’s a war, I mean, it [TSMC] would be destroyed. Everything will be destroyed.”
A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be a catastrophe for the global supply chain.
How can Taiwan prevent the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from attacking and destroying the country’s chip production sites? The National Security Council, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and other government agencies should jointly study this, setting it as an “operation scenario” in the annual Han Kuang military exercises.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to
RSS