Although Tesla and SpaceX chief executive officer Elon Musk donated Starlink platforms to Ukraine following its invasion by Russia, Musk has drawn condemnation after a misguided proposal for a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv. He was also accused of blocking Starlink in areas of occupied Ukraine.
On Oct. 14, CNN reported that “SpaceX has warned the Pentagon that it may stop funding the service in Ukraine unless the US military kicks in tens of millions of dollars per month.”
This caused some panic among Ukrainian officials. On Monday last week, following a public backlash, Musk said Starlink would not be turned off regardless of US military funding.
This back-and-forth farce regarding the operation of Starlink for Ukraine raises serious concerns.
Musk — neither trained nor elected — is in an immensely powerful and influential position where he could do serious damage to the Ukrainian war effort if his subversive rhetoric goes unchecked.
For instance, Musk wrote on Twitter that “Crimea [is] formally part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake).”
Moscow lauded Musk for the tweet. It not only advanced pro-Russia propaganda, but also ignored and oversimplified the intricate history between Crimea, Ukraine and Russia.
It is a historical fact that Crimea was never part of the Russian Federation prior to its illegal annexation in 2014.
The 1994 Budapest Memorandum — signed by then-US president Bill Clinton, then-British prime minister John Major, then-Russian president Boris Yeltsin and then-Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma — promised to uphold the territorial integrity of Ukraine, which includes Crimea.
Starlink is undoubtedly crucial for the Ukrainians in this conflict. Starlink is a satellite Internet constellation with thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit.
Satellite Internet service with low latency and high bandwidth is essential in a modern conflict where existing communication infrastructure can be targeted. The destruction of satellites is much more costly and difficult. Only a small number of weapons systems are designed to target satellites.
The defense of Taiwan would also require satellite Internet service as a contingency, but with an unpredictable narcissist with a clear conflict of interest — judging from Musk’s business investments in China — in charge of Starlink, Taiwan must look to other services or develop its own.
Minister of Digital Development Audrey Tang (唐鳳) announced efforts to secure satellite Internet backup over the next few years. The selection process should account for the qualifications of the satellite Internet companies and also the people running them.
Taiwan should maintain a level of control over these satellites to prevent the disabling of Internet services from the company’s end. This necessitates technological transfers to Taiwan in the operation of these satellites.
Taiwan should also consider diversifying its satellite Internet services to lessen the effectiveness of cyberattacks. Viasat, Ukraine’s primary satellite Internet service prior to the war, was targeted by Russia in an attack just one hour prior to its invasion on Feb. 24.
Taiwan’s decision to invest in satellite Internet provides a great opportunity to expand the nation’s space industry, to improve military command and control capabilities, and provide services for underserved communities.
The selection process must prevent Chinese infiltration or espionage, while mitigating unpredictable changes in affiliations from foreign service providers.
Linus Chiou studies physics and history at the University of Virginia.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough