Kicking off the UN’s second annual Sustainable Development Goals Moment last month, UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador Priyanka Chopra Jonas emphasized the role of solidarity as a driver of change.
“Global solidarity is more important than ever,” she said. “Together, we have an extraordinary opportunity to change the world we live in.”
While Chopra Jonas was referring to the fight against climate change, that sentiment could apply to many other global issues. Solidarity is essential to solving many of humanity’s most pressing challenges, but it is crucial for achieving health security.
After close to three years after COVID-19 was first reported, the world’s health systems are coming apart at the seams. While the end of the pandemic might be in sight, the virus is still raging.
Moreover, the WHO officially declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and cases of vaccine-derived poliovirus have been documented in more than 30 countries, including the US and the UK.
At a time when infectious diseases can spread around the world within hours, global solidarity matters more than ever. What this means is straightforward. People living along the path of an approaching wildfire must work together to extinguish it. The same goes for global health security.
In 1966 — at the height of the Cold War — the US teamed up with the Soviet Union to end smallpox and measles. This collaboration, in turn, encouraged the WHO to lead the eradication program.
There are important lessons to be learned from this history. For starters, global health solidarity could lead to unexpected alliances. The US and the Soviet Union were rival superpowers, yet they bracketed the Cold War to eradicate a disease that had affected humanity for more than 3,000 years.
Moreover, putting a global organization such as the WHO in charge ensured that the smallpox vaccine was freely available to every country, without richer countries hoarding doses. The last case of smallpox was identified in Somalia in 1977, 10 years after the program began, and the WHO declared the disease eradicated three years later. The entire effort cost US$300 million, but it is estimated to have saved more than US$1 billion per year.
Polio is another disease that is close to eradication, thanks to a coordinated global effort. Rotary International — which has 1.4 million members worldwide — launched a campaign to immunize children around the world against polio in 1985. Three years later, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative was established at the WHO’s World Health Assembly. Many countries joined the initiative, contributed funds, and mobilized agencies and communities.
In the 34 years since its founding, GPEI has reduced the global incidence of polio by more than 99 percent, prevented paralysis in more than 10 million people and immunized 2.5 billion children.
We seem to have forgotten these lessons. In contrast to the concerted global push to end smallpox and polio, the response to COVID-19 has been characterized by nationalist parochialism. The pandemic is a global calamity that has killed more than 6 million people, and afflicted at least 100 million with so-called long COVID-19.
However, this time, instead of coordinating their responses, developed countries focused on mitigating its impact within their borders. Rich Western countries adopted a siege mentality, hoarding personal protective equipment, vaccines and drugs, and leaving poorer countries to settle for crumbs.
Africa, on the other hand, initiated the world’s best-coordinated response to COVID-19, by marshaling the resources of regional institutions such as the African Union and fostering local partnerships. Addressing a pandemic such as COVID-19 requires this level of cooperation on a global scale.
The COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access (COVAX) facility was meant to be a coordinating mechanism to help galvanize the worldwide vaccination effort and ensure that lower-income countries could access vaccines, but it has faced constant funding gaps and struggled to acquire doses.
COVAX enabled corporate interests to use UN processes to safeguard their profits, with little regard to the social costs, former New York chief of the UN Conference on Trade and Development Harris Gleckman said.
Simply put, vaccine nationalism killed vulnerable people. Mike Whelan, project leader of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations — a foundation that helped launch COVAX — acknowledged this in a panel discussion.
The response to monkeypox is another example of how vaccine nationalism harms global health security. African countries have been battling monkeypox for decades, but the disease did not attract international attention until cases started appearing in the West.
Nigeria’s first case was reported in 1972, and cases have been detected there every year since 2017. Yet even as people are being vaccinated against the disease in developed countries, African countries are still waiting for their doses.
The chance to do better is right around the corner. Health authorities in Uganda have declared an Ebola outbreak after a case was confirmed in the country’s Mubende district. Global solidarity is necessary to contain it. Higher-income countries must take the lead in developing detection and response mechanisms, and global institutions such as the UN and the WHO must counter nationalism by promoting equity.
Together, we can defeat disease outbreaks before they spiral. On our own, it is always much harder. As an Igbo proverb says: “When your house is on fire, do not hunt for rats.”
Ifeanyi Nsofor, a medical doctor, is senior new voices fellow at the Aspen Institute, a global Atlantic fellow for Health Equity at George Washington University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has