US President Joe Biden’s administration is considering ways to jointly manufacture arms with Taiwan either through US arms manufacturers providing Taiwan with the technology or Taiwan-made components being assembled in the US. Recent reports have said that arms deliveries from the US to Taiwan would be delayed. That could be a sign of a dramatic shift from “US-standard, US-made” to “US-standard, Taiwan-made” weapons.
US support for Taiwan has been conditioned by its relations with China. When China takes a peaceful attitude, the US pays less attention to Taiwan’s military power. When China is aggressive, the US acts accordingly, contributing to Taiwan’s defense capability based on existing acts.
In the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, Section 2 specifies that “the US decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means.”
The implication is clear: A Chinese invasion of Taiwan means a declaration of war against the US, and an end to US-China relations.
Section 3 is the key to Taiwan’s arms industry: “The US will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”
The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology and Aerospace Industrial Development Corp have developed F-16V and Indigenous Defense Fighter jets and other weapons.
China has focused on the 1982 Sino-US joint communique, particularly the following: Arms sales to Taiwan from the US “will not exceed, either in qualitative or in quantitative terms, the level of those supplied in recent years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the US,” and the US would “reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a final resolution.” However, it has conveniently forgotten then-National People’s Congress chairman Ye Jianying’s (葉劍英) 1981 “nine points,” with its promises of a peaceful China.
Furthermore, then-US president Ronald Reagan said: “Any agreement we reach with Beijing will be predicated on a continuation of Beijing’s peaceful intentions toward Taiwan,” and “it is essential that the quantity and quality of the arms provided [to] Taiwan be conditioned entirely on the threat posed” by China.
That is, once Beijing resorts to the use of force, the US does not have to keep its word.
In 2005, China’s “Anti-Secession” Law was enacted. Article 8 states that China shall use non-peaceful and other necessary means to defend its sovereignty and territory. Furthermore, at the opening of the 20th National Congress, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said: “We will never promise to give up the use of force, and reserve the right to take all necessary measures.”
In September 2017, the American Institute in Taiwan discussed with Taiwanese firms ways to supply food, fresh water and household goods to US vessels, which was sanctioned by the US National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018. Section 1259 of the report said that the US secretary of defense is to report on “the feasibility and advisability of the US Navy making port calls to Taiwan.” Since 2018, the successful bidder in Taiwan has started supplying US vessels around Kaohsiung’s Second Port to Siaoliouciou Island (小琉球). Around the same time, a US Navy research vessel also berthed in Kaohsiung Port’s Wharf No. 9.
The mode of manufacturing arms should be changed to “US-standard, Taiwan-made,” and its development deserves great attention.
HoonTing is a political commentator.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
In a Taiwanese university classroom, a lecturer asks in English: “Can anyone give me an example from Taiwan?” Students look down. No one answers. After class, one student writes on the course platform in Mandarin: “I understood the concept, but I didn’t know how to answer in English.” That moment highlights a key issue in Taiwan’s English-medium instruction (EMI) reform: It is not just about more English-taught courses, but whether students can learn, participate and belong. EMI expansion is part of the Bilingual 2030 policy and the Ministry of Education’s BEST Program, aiming to improve English ability, support EMI teaching
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
The Ministry of the Interior, working with the navy and coast guard, is organizing Taiwan’s first joint exercise simulating escort tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil through a Chinese blockade. The drills simulate fuel transport along three maritime corridors leading toward Japan, the Philippines and the US. Deputy Minister of the Interior Sawyer Mars (馬士元) said that a blockade of the Taiwan Strait would amount to “almost a 100 percent blockade of the regional energy supply.” Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo said planning to counter a blockade is standard practice in Taipei. While the exercise is limited in
RSS