President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said “I am Taiwanese” in her address marking Double Ten National Day, which the Presidential Office referred to as “Taiwan National Day.”
Tsai is known for her prudence and caution, so the bold gesture in highlighting the title Taiwan deserves support and encouragement.
Politics, it has been said, is the art of compromise, but the outcome can be embarrassing. Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that Oct. 10 is the national day of the Republic of China (ROC), but his concept is fundamentally wrong.
Double Ten National Day is a myth created by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), whose members believe that the ROC was founded on Oct. 10, 1911, with the Wuchang Uprising. No government was founded on that day.
On Oct. 11 that year, the revolutionaries took over Hanyang, and the next day they captured Hankou and established the Hubei military government, which had “the Republic of China” in the literal meaning of its full official name.
Later, more provinces followed suit and established their own independent governments. On Jan. 1, 1912, a conference of the provincial representatives established the Provisional Government of the Republic of China in Nanjing.
However, the provisional government served no practical function, as the provinces, mainly in central and southern China, continued to do things their own way.
It was not until the provisional government negotiated peace with then-Qing Dynasty government official Yuan Shikai (袁世凱) — who forced the abdication of the final Qing monarch, was elected provisional president and sworn in on March 10 — that the ROC was founded.
The KMT stages this same farce every year. On Oct. 10, it hangs the “Blue Sky, White Sun and a Wholly Red Earth” flag, a joke that lacks historical sense.
The Hubei military government used the “Iron Blood Eighteen-Star” flag, and the provisional government and its branches used the five-colored flag. The one that the KMT hangs is the naval flag of the provisional government.
The farce has nothing to do with Taiwan, which was under Japanese rule at that time and was not connected to China. In this sense, Ma’s argument has a point: Making Oct. 10 “Taiwan National Day” is illogical — a poorly conceived fabrication.
Taiwan should have its own national day, perhaps on the day when it is normalized and officially founded as a country.
If Taiwanese must decide on the date now, here are some options:
If people are to pursue common ground between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party, they could consider March 1, the day in 1950 that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正) took office as president, marking the beginning of the “ROC in Taiwan,” despite it being essentially a foreign regime.
If people take into account the day when Taiwanese became the masters of the nation, July 28 would be worth celebrating, because that is when former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in 1994 pushed to amend the Constitution to allow direct presidential elections.
Double Ten National Day, which is seen by some as the birthday of a dead republic, is nothing but a farce.
Taiwanese deserve a real “Taiwan National Day.” It is a pity that Tsai did not take a historic step to create one in the third year of her second term. Hopefully, a future leader can have a keen awareness of the nation’s history and find a proper national birthday for Taiwanese.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association, president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance and a medical doctor.
Translated by Sylvia Hsu
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS