Eighteen-year-olds are considered too young to vote, but are defined as adults by the Civil Code, subject to full criminal responsibility and required to perform military service to protect Taiwan and its people. Those aged 16 or older can legally work and pay taxes.
Based on the principle of symmetry of rights and duties, the constitutional amendment to lower the voting age to 18 should not be delayed any longer. It is time to allow young people aged 18 or older to have rights in line with their duties.
Among the 230 or so countries in the world, only nine still have a voting age above 18. Most lowered their voting age to 18 in the 20th century. In the 21st century, some countries are even discussing lowering it to 16.
Other nations in East Asia have amended their laws in the past few years so that 18-year-olds can be granted full citizenship rights.
Japan made the amendment in 2015, Malaysia in 2019 and South Korea in 2020.
So why does the public not support the constitutional amendment in Taiwan?
Many Taiwanese doubt that young people understand politics, or are capable of taking care of themselves and making independent decisions. Those who oppose referendums held alongside elections are also concerned about political interference on campus.
The truth is that the younger generation has become more mature in thinking about public participation and their civic literacy is higher than ever. They pay more attention to public issues such as environmental protection, gender equality and human rights.
The referendum is to be held alongside the nine-in-one local elections on Nov. 26.
Although Taiwan is a democratic model for Asia, it is the only democracy in which 18-year-olds cannot vote.
Hopefully, there will be a successful amendment to the Constitution that keeps up with the global trends of democracy and allows the younger generation to decide their future with older Taiwanese.
In addition to encouraging young people to cherish their rights, the support of the older generations should be sought.
Wei Si-yuan works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Sylvia Hsu
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS