Eighteen-year-olds are considered too young to vote, but are defined as adults by the Civil Code, subject to full criminal responsibility and required to perform military service to protect Taiwan and its people. Those aged 16 or older can legally work and pay taxes.
Based on the principle of symmetry of rights and duties, the constitutional amendment to lower the voting age to 18 should not be delayed any longer. It is time to allow young people aged 18 or older to have rights in line with their duties.
Among the 230 or so countries in the world, only nine still have a voting age above 18. Most lowered their voting age to 18 in the 20th century. In the 21st century, some countries are even discussing lowering it to 16.
Other nations in East Asia have amended their laws in the past few years so that 18-year-olds can be granted full citizenship rights.
Japan made the amendment in 2015, Malaysia in 2019 and South Korea in 2020.
So why does the public not support the constitutional amendment in Taiwan?
Many Taiwanese doubt that young people understand politics, or are capable of taking care of themselves and making independent decisions. Those who oppose referendums held alongside elections are also concerned about political interference on campus.
The truth is that the younger generation has become more mature in thinking about public participation and their civic literacy is higher than ever. They pay more attention to public issues such as environmental protection, gender equality and human rights.
The referendum is to be held alongside the nine-in-one local elections on Nov. 26.
Although Taiwan is a democratic model for Asia, it is the only democracy in which 18-year-olds cannot vote.
Hopefully, there will be a successful amendment to the Constitution that keeps up with the global trends of democracy and allows the younger generation to decide their future with older Taiwanese.
In addition to encouraging young people to cherish their rights, the support of the older generations should be sought.
Wei Si-yuan works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Sylvia Hsu
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS