Eighteen-year-olds are considered too young to vote, but are defined as adults by the Civil Code, subject to full criminal responsibility and required to perform military service to protect Taiwan and its people. Those aged 16 or older can legally work and pay taxes.
Based on the principle of symmetry of rights and duties, the constitutional amendment to lower the voting age to 18 should not be delayed any longer. It is time to allow young people aged 18 or older to have rights in line with their duties.
Among the 230 or so countries in the world, only nine still have a voting age above 18. Most lowered their voting age to 18 in the 20th century. In the 21st century, some countries are even discussing lowering it to 16.
Other nations in East Asia have amended their laws in the past few years so that 18-year-olds can be granted full citizenship rights.
Japan made the amendment in 2015, Malaysia in 2019 and South Korea in 2020.
So why does the public not support the constitutional amendment in Taiwan?
Many Taiwanese doubt that young people understand politics, or are capable of taking care of themselves and making independent decisions. Those who oppose referendums held alongside elections are also concerned about political interference on campus.
The truth is that the younger generation has become more mature in thinking about public participation and their civic literacy is higher than ever. They pay more attention to public issues such as environmental protection, gender equality and human rights.
The referendum is to be held alongside the nine-in-one local elections on Nov. 26.
Although Taiwan is a democratic model for Asia, it is the only democracy in which 18-year-olds cannot vote.
Hopefully, there will be a successful amendment to the Constitution that keeps up with the global trends of democracy and allows the younger generation to decide their future with older Taiwanese.
In addition to encouraging young people to cherish their rights, the support of the older generations should be sought.
Wei Si-yuan works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Sylvia Hsu
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS