Public debates over discrimination based on educational background have emerged in the past week, after Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator and Hsinchu mayoral candidate Ann Kao (高虹安) defended herself against an accusation of plagiarism of her doctoral thesis.
As Kao’s defense was perceived as “arrogant” by many and she came under fire, Taipei Mayor and TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) attempt to support her by comparing her treatment to that of a rape victim only added fuel to the fire.
Chinese-language media on Tuesday reported that Kao allegedly plagiarized two previous studies, which she had coauthored with her doctoral advisor, in her dissertation. While Kao defended herself by saying that self-plagiarism is not a copyright infringement, she did so by ridiculing former Hsinchu City mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅), whose master’s degrees were revoked by National Taiwan University (NTU) and Chung Hua University (CHU) for plagiarism, which offended some people.
“I, Ann Kao, from a young age studied at Taipei First Girls’ Senior High School, entered National Taiwan Normal University as the top candidate and graduated from NTU with a No. 1 academic performance award by the Phi Tau Phi Scholastic Honor Society. I am not someone who graduated from the evening division of CHU and later needed to ‘inflate’ myself with an NTU master’s degree,” she said.
After protest by CHU students and alumni, she was asked by its students’ association to respond. Kao on Wednesday evening released a video apologizing to CHU faculty and students for her “imprecise wording.” On Wednesday, Kao cried during a radio interview while explaining that she felt wronged and angry because she “is not Lin Chih-chien and did not plagiarize.”
On Friday, at the Legislative Yuan, she avoided reporters’ questions about the accusation, but used her smartphone to record the reporters. She later said she was just “showing them her phone case.”
Ko on Thursday compared Kao’s situation to “when a bully tries to rape a girl, and the girl resists and bites him, but everyone blames her for biting,” adding that their political rivals had gone too far in “using the state apparatus to attack a little girl.”
Ko’s remark exacerbated the criticism, and politicians across party lines asked him to apologize for his rape metaphor. He brushed them off by saying that he only used “strong words” because he understood Kao’s feeling of defamation.
It is not the first time Ko has used rape as a metaphor, or made sexist remarks. For example, he said “being raped is cheaper than being seduced” when explaining an urban renewal policy, and “obstetricians deal with one hole and make a living between women’s thighs” during a lecture at a university, while at a gender equality forum, he said: “Taipei has imported 300,000 foreign brides.” He has also made discriminatory comments, such as calling a female mayoral candidate “beautiful and suitable for being a counter girl,” and joking that “Taiwanese women who go outside without makeup frighten people on the streets.” He also equated 30 percent of women aged 30 or over being unmarried to a “national security crisis.”
While Kao on Friday supported Ko by saying that his rape metaphor was only a “straightforward reaction” to express his resentment against the pan-green camp for bullying her, he placed her into the role of a “victim” and “a little girl,” incapable of defending herself.
Kao should be using her many media resources to explain herself, instead of hiding behind her phone, or showing off her phone case. Meanwhile, Ko’s rape analogy should not be excused or taken lightly by the public. Tolerating such remarks trivializes the real experience of sexual assault victims, reinforces the male chauvinist attitude, and is an act of feminizing weakness and incompetence.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS