Taiwanese singer Rainie Yang (楊丞琳) recently caused uproar when she said on a Chinese state-run TV program that although she grew up in Taipei, she is “Cantonese,” and that she rarely had seafood in Taiwan, as seafood is a luxury “there.”
To prove that Yang’s remark could not be further from the truth, furious Taiwanese started posting pictures of seafood online and checking in on local restaurants’ social media pages.
However, Minister Without Portfolio Chang Ching-sen (張景森) said Taiwanese should not behave like China’s “little pinks” and should not launch vicious online attacks on celebrities in the style of Cultural Revolution “struggle sessions.”
Writer Ku Ling (苦苓) spoke up for Yang, saying that she was referring to her childhood, when her family could not afford seafood, and did not mean to say that seafood is a luxury in today’s Taiwan, urging Taiwanese not to behave like “little pinks.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Guei-min (李貴敏) parroted China’s stance, saying that Yang’s remarks were quoted out of context and the furor was a political scheme by Democratic Progressive Party supporters. She also attacked the Ministry of the Interior for commenting on artists’ remarks and described the incident as “funny as hell.”
When Taiwanese artists make pro-China remarks to gain access to the country’s vast market, it is a matter of morality and principle.
However, sycophantic behavior and giving untruthful accounts do little more than laud China and belittle Taiwan. Surely, Chang and Ku cannot be serious when comparing the behavior of China’s “little pinks” to Taiwanese Internet users posting satirical photographs online?
The term “little pink” describes jingoistic Chinese Internet users who vehemently defend the Chinese Communist Party, scrutinizing online posts and attacking whoever they deem had “insulted China” or “hurt the feelings of Chinese.”
It is this hypersensitivity that has led people to consider “little pinks” as the modern Red Guards.
In 2018, Italian luxury fashion brand Dolce and Gabbana provoked public outrage in China by posting a video depicting a Chinese woman attempting to eat pizza, spaghetti and cannoli with chopsticks. Racist comments made by Dolce and Gabbana cofounder Stefano Gabbana were also leaked, in which he called China a “country of crap” and called those who criticized the brand “ignorant dirty smelling mafia.”
Last year, singer Karen Mok (莫文蔚) posted a picture wearing a Dolce and Gabbana bathrobe on social media, causing a backlash in China. Her agency apologized and Mok removed the photo.
During the promotion for the action film Fast & Furious 9: The Fast Saga, actor John Cena said in an interview that “Taiwan is the first country that can watch F9,” also causing an online backlash in China. Cena quickly posted a video on Sina Weibo, saying in Mandarin: “I love and respect China and Chinese people. I’m very very sorry for my mistake.”
When retail giants H&M, Uniqlo, Nike and Adidas boycotted cotton from Xinjiang over the Chinese government’s human rights abuses against minorities in the region, the “little pinks” called for a boycott of the brands’ products. Taiwanese artists such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), Chen Li-nong (陳立農), Janine Chang (張鈞甯) and Greg Hsu (許光漢) terminated their contracts with the companies.
Posting a few pictures of seafood to satirize Yang does not come anywhere near bullying. Compared with the unreasonable behavior of Chinese Internet users, Taiwanese posting about the incident were gentle and kind.
Lin Han is a junior-high schoolteacher.
Translated by Rita Wang
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times