Robert Tsao (曹興誠), the founder of United Microelectronics Corp (UMC), has been making waves with his “all-out defense” proposal.
Critics have said that if civilians are trained to use firearms to defend against a potential Chinese invasion — to the extent that people have guns in their homes as the Swiss do — it might lead to the proliferation and misuse of guns.
Such concerns are redundant and are the unfortunate legacy of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) authoritarian rule, which left Taiwan with a severe case of hoplophobia — an irrational fear of guns.
There is no widespread misuse of guns in Switzerland, despite the stunningly high rate of gun ownership there.
Rifles used by the military are not suitable to engage in criminal activities. In Taiwan, such violence has revolved around handguns. The unsolved 1996 murder of Taoyuan county commissioner Liu Pang-yu (劉邦友) and seven others is an example. The murderer had used handguns and killed the people execution-style, meaning that the result would have been the same if guns were not available, just that the weapon would have been a knife.
The most infamous case of military-grade arms ownership was gangster Chang Hsi-ming (張錫銘) and his heavily armed gang. Chang was arrested after a gunbattle with police in 2005. Despite Chang’s rifles and submachine guns — which were deployed in several shoot-outs with police — they did not cause a lot of casualties.
On Sept. 4, there was a mass stabbing in Saskatchewan, Canada, in which 10 people died and 18 were injured.
In 2014, Cheng Chieh (鄭捷) killed four people and injured 22 in a stabbing frenzy on a Taipei MRT train with a Swiss pocket knife.
Prohibiting knives is obviously unworkable, and regardless, crimes are committed by people determined to do so. The lack of a particular form of weapon will not stop them.
Most ordinary Taiwanese have an aversion to guns, which probably stems from the KMT’s authoritarian regime. Fearing that people might rise up against it, the party instilled a fear of firearms. Even realistic-looking toy guns were once on the brink of being banned. With most people fearing guns, Taiwan has unconsciously undermined its national self-defense.
People might think that they are safe with strict gun controls, but they do not realize that black-market guns are in wide circulation, leading to criminals like Chang having weapons more powerful than even the police.
If critics of Tsao’s ideas have doubts about public security, they should focus on clamping down on crime and black-market guns instead of worrying that such policies might go astray.
Moreover, an all-out defense policy can be realized step by step instead of adopting the Switzerland model outright and immediately allowing military reservists to keep guns at home.
The first stage could be to enable people to get used to shooting at ranges. If stricter caution is deemed necessary, guns could be supervised by the military and given to people only at practice sessions. Such details could be ironed out to develop a workable and safe policy.
Having supervised many shooting practice sessions for students and conscripts, the military is familiar with weapons management and regulations.
Taiwan must be able to defend itself. To ensure its survival and to keep enemies at bay, people need basic military knowledge, not an ingrained fear of guns.
The first step toward safeguarding Taiwan is to repel the ghost of hoplophobia.
Tommy Lin is director of Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Rita Wang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS