The Baltic states — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — in 1940 were invaded and occupied by the Soviet Union, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin and the auspices of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, a nonaggression treaty between Germany and the Soviets signed in 1939.
Conducting illegal surveillance, detention and execution, the Soviet Union carried out the June Deportation of 1941, in which 95,000 people were exiled to Siberian labor camps for “re-education.”
The victims included civil servants, military personnel, police officers, teachers, wealthy businesspeople, elderly people, women and children. Most of these “class enemies” never lived to see their homeland again.
Moscow attempted to “Sovietize” the Baltic states by introducing Russians, the Russian language and ideological education in the three countries, while saying that they “voluntarily joined the Soviet Union.”
On Aug. 23, 1989 — the 50th anniversary of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact — national movements such as the Estonian Popular Front initiated the “Baltic way,” a peaceful political demonstration to fight for their sovereignty and freedom. At 7pm, more than 2 million inhabitants of the Baltic states joined hands to form a human chain of 690km connecting the Baltic capitals — Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius.
Among the participants, there were elderly people with walking canes, babies in their swaddles, Forest Brothers — Latvian, Lithuanian and Estonian partisans, also known as “Forest Friars” — often in wheelchairs, and people who saw their family members taken away. Holding candles, they sang to commemorate their family members under the billowing flags of their nations.
At a time without mobile phones, the Internet or social media, the Baltic people demonstrated exceptional courage to stand up for their freedom regardless of the leadership in Moscow, which led to the Baltic states recovering their independence.
After restoring their sovereignty, the Baltic states started to work on transition and recovery.
However, the Russian threat never ceased. As one-quarter of Latvia’s population are ethnic Russians, linguistic and ethnic proximity has made Latvia more vulnerable to information warfare. According to the Sweden-based researchers at the V-Dem Institute, Latvia is the second-most targeted country by foreign governments spreading false information, while the most targeted country is none other than Taiwan.
The Baltic states’ protest has marked its 33rd anniversary, while Taiwan’s Hand-in-Hand Rally to commemorate the 228 Incident marked its 18th anniversary.
For the past few decades, the Baltic states and Taiwan have proved they are sovereign, peace-loving nations that value democracy, human rights and the international order.
In contrast, China and Russia have been irresponsible troublemakers and violators of human rights — from the cover-up of the initial COVID-19 outbreak in China, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has led to an energy and food crisis around the world, to China’s repeated threats of annexing Taiwan by force and changing the “status quo” in the Indo-Pacific region.
The Baltic states and Taiwan were once in the same boat of having to suffer at the hands of dictators.
However, these small yet resilient nations have risen up to strive for democracy and freedom. As targets of intimidation, Taiwanese would be able to stand up to their nation’s bellicose neighbor and prevail against it with dignity — just like David did over Goliath in the Bible.
Hsu Meng-wei holds a master’s degree in public policy and administration from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS