China’s launching of missiles over Taiwan during military drills earlier this month was “irresponsible,” and something that must be contested, a senior US Navy official said on Tuesday.
“It’s very important that we contest this type of thing. If we just allow [missiles over Taiwan] to happen, and we don’t contest that, that’ll be the next norm,” US Seventh Fleet Commander Vice Admiral Karl Thomas said.
In Taiwan, news of the missiles went public only after a report by the Japanese Ministry of Defense, as five of the missiles landed in Japanese waters. The Taiwanese Ministry of National Defense’s (MND) decision not to issue air-raid warnings drew some criticism, but its rationale for not doing so is sound. China hoped the launches would incite terror among Taiwanese and the MND dashed that hope by not reporting them until after the fact. There is also the issue of the missiles’ peak altitude, estimated at between 150 and 250km. At that height the missiles would have entered the thermosphere — far above the 10km to 13km altitude at which commercial planes fly.
However, such tests are not without danger, and that is why they cannot become normalized. On descent, the missiles could collide with aircraft or vessels, including smaller fishing boats that might not be aware that tests are taking place. Even if vessels and aircraft are notified of tests and leave the area, the disruptions to their operations would have an economic impact.
The US and other countries might pressure China over the testing of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), but Beijing is not alone in conducting such tests. The US on Tuesday tested its Minuteman III ICBM, and while Washington has a Ballistic Missile Launch Notification Agreement with Russia, there is no such agreement with China.
Taiwan is unlikely to be able to work out any sort of agreement on missile testing with China, but the US could seek to reach a launch notification agreement with Beijing, and an agreement on where ICBMs could be tested. However, Beijing might simply break such an agreement, just as it has done with agreements on Hong Kong’s autonomy.
That leaves the question of what can be done to prevent further ICBM launches over Taiwan.
The American Physical Society in January reported that the US military’s current defenses against ICBMs are inadequate. Rand Corp defense researcher Bruce Bennett was quoted by Voice of America as saying that using the US’ ground-based interceptors to stop an incoming ICBM would be like “shooting a bullet with a bullet.”
If ICBM launches over Taiwan do become regular, US researchers could work with Taiwanese researchers to study the launches and jointly develop a more effective defense system. Another option would be for Taiwanese researchers to work with Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries to develop a modified version of Israel’s Iron Dome for use in Taiwan.
Such a system could also benefit South Korea and Japan, which face missile threats from North Korea. An effective next-generation missile-defense system is something that would benefit all of these nations, and something that the best minds from these nations should jointly develop.
It is clear that China aims to continue testing its boundaries and encroaching on Taiwan’s sovereignty. It is imperative that Taiwan work with the US and other friendly nations to take concrete actions now to prevent that from happening.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS