At a time when tensions across the Taiwan Strait are running high due to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducting military exercises around Taiwan, the Taiwan Affairs Office of China’s State Council published a white paper titled The Taiwan Question and China’s Reunification in the New Era.
The last time the Chinese government published a white paper on the Taiwan issue was 22 years ago, and this is the first such paper to be published since Xi Jinping (習近平) became president of China.
Beijing’s decision to publish its third-ever white paper on the Taiwan issue at this time reveals that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is feeling the pressure of the international community’s support for Taiwan and its efforts to contain China, especially under the influence of the US’ Indo-Pacific strategy.
A wide range of international organizations — including NATO, the Five Eyes alliance, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, AUKUS and, most recently, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity — all view communist China their main adversary, or at least as one of their main adversaries, and these groupings have launched military, intelligence, economic and diplomatic efforts to contain Beijing.
As pressure from the international community grows, it has become more difficult for China to attack Taiwan. It was with this in mind that the Chinese government published its third-ever white paper on the Taiwan issue, showing that Chinese leaders have run into a major stumbling block on their intended path toward unification with Taiwan. They now face huge risks that they had not expected.
Therefore, they decided to launch another international opinion offensive so as to make their voice heard on the Taiwan issue.
The Chinese government repeatedly states in its white paper that China wants “peaceful reunification,” and it promises that “reunification” will bring all kinds of benefits to Taiwan.
It says that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are like brothers and can learn to get along much better.
However, the white paper also states that China “will not renounce the use of force.”
China’s threat of possibly launching an armed invasion makes it sound more like a bully than a brother.
It is foreseeable that China is likely to go on using a carrot-and-stick approach to push Taiwan toward unification.
It must be said that Taiwan’s sovereignty belongs to all of its more than 23 million people, and only Taiwanese can decide the nation’s future. Taiwan will never accept a cross-strait endgame demanded by the CCP dictatorship.
If the CCP tries to force Taiwanese to accept its heavy-handed actions, it would only cause greater revulsion among Taiwanese. It would also be rejected by the international community.
The Chinese government’s self-inflating white paper shows it to be an enemy to the rest of the world.
Nick Hu is a graduate student.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US