Amid the worst cross-strait security crisis in 20 years, the Chinese State Council on Wednesday released a white paper titled The Taiwan Question and China’s Reunification in the New Era, an update to Taiwan white papers issued in 1993 and 2000.
The new white paper says that Taiwan is part of China and Beijing “will not renounce the use of force” to achieve unification, hailing the “one country, two systems” framework as the most inclusive solution to the situation, but not mentioning the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Later that day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) embarked with a delegation on a trip to China, despite having drawn fire from across Taiwan’s political spectrum, even from within his party. Defending the trip, the KMT said it has no political intentions because the delegation would not visit Beijing, but Hsia undermined the message by saying they would not reject meetings with Chinese politicians suggested by their hosts.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said the trip not only disappointed Taiwanese, but could send a wrong message to the international community. The visit also received a backlash from KMT councilors and younger party members, such as KMT New Taipei City councilor candidate Lu Chia-kai (呂家愷), who slammed the trip as “lacking legitimacy and good reason,” and calling Hsia the “black sheep of the party.”
With cross-strait tensions escalating, the KMT could not have chosen a worse time for the trip, which has aroused skepticism regarding its stance and inflicted damage to Taiwan’s image in the global community.
Hsia facilitated a landmark meeting between then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in 2015, and his China visit might have a hidden agenda, despite the KMT’s denial. Past dealings show that everything turns political when it comes to exchanges with the Chinese Communist Party. Hsia’s visit — carried out on behalf of KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) — is an attempt to butter the party’s bread on both sides. The KMT increasingly claims a “pro-US stance,” with Chu touting it during a US trip and on Facebook welcoming a Taiwan visit by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but it now sends Hsia to China to seek Beijing’s approval. Pandering to China, Chu ordered the visit vying for a position of “peacemaker” between Taipei and Beijing.
However, the KMT is disregarding the unfolding crisis and placing its selfish interests above Taiwan’s image in the global community. Hsia’s visit can be interpreted as kowtowing to Beijing, leaving the world confused about Taiwan’s position at a time when the nation is garnering increasing support from the global community and positioning itself as a sovereign country that is not subordinate to China.
The KMT is also disrespecting the efforts of the military, which is helping Taiwan safeguard its territory, democracy, and its people and their property.
While the Indo-Pacific region is ripe with anti-China sentiment — with the US, Japan and other nations condemning China’s military drills and saber-rattling — Beijing might claim that a friendly visit by the vice chairman of Taiwan’s largest opposition party showed that the world misunderstands the situation and that it is merely “protecting” Taiwan.
It takes two to tango. China’s unification tactic can only work when it has collaborators. Should Beijing try to invade Taiwan, messages sent by the KMT might give Taiwan’s allies second thoughts before sending help. With this unwise move, the KMT is undermining Taiwan’s image and creating further division in the party, likely sending its support ratings into a nosedive.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.