In the ninth century, an Ethiopian herder named Kaldi noticed something odd. Whenever his goats ate the berries of a particular tree, they seemed to get a jolt of energy. His curiosity piqued, Kaldi took some of the berries to a monastery, where the abbot took a taste and, shocked by their bitterness, tossed the berries into the fire. To both of their surprise, however, a tantalizing aroma soon wafted in their direction. They removed the now-roasted berries from the fire, soaked them in water and took the first-ever sip of coffee.
It is fitting that African countries today command a significant share of a global industry that has since become an integral part of billions of people’s lives. Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda all rank among the world’s top 25 coffee producers, while several other countries — including Angola, Ghana, Liberia, Burundi, Zambia, Sao Tome and Principe, and Sierra Leone — are increasing their market share.
Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that African coffee farmers will reap their fair share of benefits from these efforts.
Globally, coffee exports will be worth an estimated US$155 billion by 2026. Although coffee is becoming the drink of choice around Africa, thanks to the rapid growth of the continent’s middle class, whether African farmers, of coffee or other crops, can take advantage of such opportunities depends significantly on the trajectory of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
Once fully implemented, the AfCFTA will be the world’s largest free-trade area, connecting 1.3 billion consumers across 54 countries in a single market for goods and services. The UN’s Conference on Trade and Development estimates that the AfCFTA could boost intra-African trade — which is currently low, with only 14.4 percent of all African exports remaining on the continent — by about 33 percent. It could also reduce the continent’s trade deficit with the rest of the world by 51 percent.
The problem is that few farmers know what the AfCFTA is, let alone how it can help them. According to a report by the not-for-profit organization Africa No Filter, awareness of the AfCFTA among micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in Nigeria was as low as 3 percent in the agricultural sector in 2020.
In East Africa, the continent’s biggest coffee-producing region, only 14 percent of the private business sector was aware of the AfCFTA. It is therefore likely that most African coffee farmers — roughly 80 percent of whom are smallholders — do not know that the AfCFTA Secretariat has signed a memorandum of understanding with the Inter-African Coffee Organization to support the development of the continent’s coffee value chain.
This is partly a matter of media coverage. As the Africa No Filter report points out, the AfCFTA features in less than 1 percent of business news about the continent.
Last year, when the AfCFTA Secretariat and the UN Development Programme released a report identifying value chains on which investment should focus — from the automotive sector to cocoa to lithium-ion batteries — the media barely covered it.
If a large share of consumers, entrepreneurs and businesses are unable to keep up with developments relating to the AfCFTA or participate in discussions about how it should develop, the agreement will start to look like yet another initiative that helps only the privileged few. This could end up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, as insufficient information and awareness prevent the majority from taking advantage of the opportunities it creates.
Given the AfCFTA’s critical importance to Africa’s economic future, that would be a major loss. To avoid this outcome, governments must use the help of media to return to two of its most essential functions: to inform and engage.
To meet the first imperative, governments should work with the AfCFTA Secretariat and other partners to revive the kinds of “awareness workshops” that were introduced when the COVID-19 pandemic began.
The goal must be to reach all stakeholders, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, with comprehensive information about the AfCFTA, using plain and accessible language to clarify the ways in which cross-border trade is being simplified. The secretariat should also ensure that all relevant information is available on accessible online platforms.
The point is not to deliver abstract facts. People tend to engage with issues only when their livelihoods are affected, so it is vital to show exactly what the AfCFTA means for businesses and consumers in practice. For example, a coffee farmer in Harar, Ethiopia, must understand both that they have a potential market in Botswana, with its developing coffee culture and large middle class, and how the AfCFTA can help them access it.
Climate change poses serious risks to the AfCFTA, as most African economies’ dependence on minerals, agriculture and wildlife leaves them vulnerable to extreme weather. According to the UN, if global warming reaches 1 to 4°C, the continent’s overall GDP is expected to decrease by 2.25 to 12.12 percent, with west, central and east Africa expected to bear the brunt of this decline.
Therefore, it is imperative to use trade as a lever for sustainable growth. Implementation of the AfCFTA must also align with Agenda 2063, the African Union’s strategic framework, which seeks inclusive growth and sustainable development for the continent, and emphasizes the importance of building “environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient economies and communities.”
To ensure that the impact of the agreement is as powerful as possible, governments should implement national-level measures and strategies to complement the AfCFTA.
At the same time, African Union institutions should work with organizations like the African Development Bank, the African Export-Import Bank and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development to improve coordination on transboundary projects affecting intra-African trade, such as infrastructure investments.
---The African Union itself should also be reformed, in line with recommendations made in 2017 by Rwandan President Paul Kagame.
More fundamentally, African governments, societies and institutions must embrace the principle that African countries share a common history and a common destiny. This will go a long way toward accelerating the AfCFTA’s implementation and maximizing its benefits.
The AfCFTA Secretariat’s secretary-general Wamkele Mene has made clear that, thanks to the agreement, Africa is “open for business.”
That is true, but it will mean little unless the people running those businesses — from smallholder farmers to innovative entrepreneurs, from Cape Town to Cairo — are aware of it and reaping the benefits.
Bogolo J. Kenewendo, a former Botswanan minister of investment, trade and industry, is a non-resident fellow at the US Center for Global Development, managing director of Kenewendo Advisory and Africa director for the UN High-Level Climate Champions.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) said in an interview with CNN on Sunday that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would render the company’s plants inoperable, and that such a war would produce “no winners.” Not only would Taiwan’s economy be destroyed in a cross-strait conflict, but the impact “would go well beyond semiconductors, and would bring about the destruction of the world’s rules-based order and totally change the geopolitical landscape,” Liu said in the interview, according to the Central News Agency. Bloomberg columnist Hal Brands wrote on June 24: “A major war over Taiwan could create global economic
Amid a fervor in the global media, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her congressional delegation made a high-profile visit to Taipei. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) awarded a state honor to her at the Presidential Office. Evidently, the occasion took on the aspect of an inter-state relationship between the US and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, despite no mutual state recognition between the two. Beijing furiously condemned Pelosi’s visit in advance, with military drills in the waters surrounding coastal China to check the move. Pelosi is a well-known China hawk, and second in the line of succession to
A stark contrast in narratives about China’s future is emerging inside and outside of China. This is partly a function of the dramatic constriction in the flow of people and ideas into and out of China, owing to China’s COVID-19 quarantine requirements. There also are fewer foreign journalists in China to help the outside world make sense of developments. Those foreign journalists and diplomats who are in China often are limited in where they can travel and who they can meet. There also is tighter technological control over information inside China than at any point since the dawn of the
Since the US cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan and established full diplomatic relations with China in 1979, the highest-ranking US political figure who has visited Taiwan has been the speaker of the US House of Representatives. A quarter-century ago, Newt Gingrich, the then-speaker of the House, had a “whirlwind” visit to Taiwan. However, Gingrich’s congressional visit to Taiwan in April 1997 happened after his three-day trip to China. This time, US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s itinerary covered Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea and Japan — the four growing and increasingly important allies and partners of the US in the Indo-Pacific region.