In the ninth century, an Ethiopian herder named Kaldi noticed something odd. Whenever his goats ate the berries of a particular tree, they seemed to get a jolt of energy. His curiosity piqued, Kaldi took some of the berries to a monastery, where the abbot took a taste and, shocked by their bitterness, tossed the berries into the fire. To both of their surprise, however, a tantalizing aroma soon wafted in their direction. They removed the now-roasted berries from the fire, soaked them in water and took the first-ever sip of coffee.
It is fitting that African countries today command a significant share of a global industry that has since become an integral part of billions of people’s lives. Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda all rank among the world’s top 25 coffee producers, while several other countries — including Angola, Ghana, Liberia, Burundi, Zambia, Sao Tome and Principe, and Sierra Leone — are increasing their market share.
Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that African coffee farmers will reap their fair share of benefits from these efforts.
Globally, coffee exports will be worth an estimated US$155 billion by 2026. Although coffee is becoming the drink of choice around Africa, thanks to the rapid growth of the continent’s middle class, whether African farmers, of coffee or other crops, can take advantage of such opportunities depends significantly on the trajectory of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
Once fully implemented, the AfCFTA will be the world’s largest free-trade area, connecting 1.3 billion consumers across 54 countries in a single market for goods and services. The UN’s Conference on Trade and Development estimates that the AfCFTA could boost intra-African trade — which is currently low, with only 14.4 percent of all African exports remaining on the continent — by about 33 percent. It could also reduce the continent’s trade deficit with the rest of the world by 51 percent.
The problem is that few farmers know what the AfCFTA is, let alone how it can help them. According to a report by the not-for-profit organization Africa No Filter, awareness of the AfCFTA among micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in Nigeria was as low as 3 percent in the agricultural sector in 2020.
In East Africa, the continent’s biggest coffee-producing region, only 14 percent of the private business sector was aware of the AfCFTA. It is therefore likely that most African coffee farmers — roughly 80 percent of whom are smallholders — do not know that the AfCFTA Secretariat has signed a memorandum of understanding with the Inter-African Coffee Organization to support the development of the continent’s coffee value chain.
This is partly a matter of media coverage. As the Africa No Filter report points out, the AfCFTA features in less than 1 percent of business news about the continent.
Last year, when the AfCFTA Secretariat and the UN Development Programme released a report identifying value chains on which investment should focus — from the automotive sector to cocoa to lithium-ion batteries — the media barely covered it.
If a large share of consumers, entrepreneurs and businesses are unable to keep up with developments relating to the AfCFTA or participate in discussions about how it should develop, the agreement will start to look like yet another initiative that helps only the privileged few. This could end up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, as insufficient information and awareness prevent the majority from taking advantage of the opportunities it creates.
Given the AfCFTA’s critical importance to Africa’s economic future, that would be a major loss. To avoid this outcome, governments must use the help of media to return to two of its most essential functions: to inform and engage.
To meet the first imperative, governments should work with the AfCFTA Secretariat and other partners to revive the kinds of “awareness workshops” that were introduced when the COVID-19 pandemic began.
The goal must be to reach all stakeholders, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, with comprehensive information about the AfCFTA, using plain and accessible language to clarify the ways in which cross-border trade is being simplified. The secretariat should also ensure that all relevant information is available on accessible online platforms.
The point is not to deliver abstract facts. People tend to engage with issues only when their livelihoods are affected, so it is vital to show exactly what the AfCFTA means for businesses and consumers in practice. For example, a coffee farmer in Harar, Ethiopia, must understand both that they have a potential market in Botswana, with its developing coffee culture and large middle class, and how the AfCFTA can help them access it.
Climate change poses serious risks to the AfCFTA, as most African economies’ dependence on minerals, agriculture and wildlife leaves them vulnerable to extreme weather. According to the UN, if global warming reaches 1 to 4°C, the continent’s overall GDP is expected to decrease by 2.25 to 12.12 percent, with west, central and east Africa expected to bear the brunt of this decline.
Therefore, it is imperative to use trade as a lever for sustainable growth. Implementation of the AfCFTA must also align with Agenda 2063, the African Union’s strategic framework, which seeks inclusive growth and sustainable development for the continent, and emphasizes the importance of building “environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient economies and communities.”
To ensure that the impact of the agreement is as powerful as possible, governments should implement national-level measures and strategies to complement the AfCFTA.
At the same time, African Union institutions should work with organizations like the African Development Bank, the African Export-Import Bank and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development to improve coordination on transboundary projects affecting intra-African trade, such as infrastructure investments.
---The African Union itself should also be reformed, in line with recommendations made in 2017 by Rwandan President Paul Kagame.
More fundamentally, African governments, societies and institutions must embrace the principle that African countries share a common history and a common destiny. This will go a long way toward accelerating the AfCFTA’s implementation and maximizing its benefits.
The AfCFTA Secretariat’s secretary-general Wamkele Mene has made clear that, thanks to the agreement, Africa is “open for business.”
That is true, but it will mean little unless the people running those businesses — from smallholder farmers to innovative entrepreneurs, from Cape Town to Cairo — are aware of it and reaping the benefits.
Bogolo J. Kenewendo, a former Botswanan minister of investment, trade and industry, is a non-resident fellow at the US Center for Global Development, managing director of Kenewendo Advisory and Africa director for the UN High-Level Climate Champions.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises