Russia is to keep creating uncertainty over shipments of oil, gas and agricultural commodities onto world markets. It has nothing to lose and lots to gain.
So do not get complacent about recent developments that might suggest Russian President Vladimir Putin is walking back from disrupting energy, food and fertilizer flows. He is not.
In the past couple of weeks, a Russian court threw out a 30-day suspension of shipments through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium’s (CPC) conduit that carries mostly Kazakhstani crude oil to an export terminal on Russia’s Black Sea coast.
The suspension, which I wrote about, would have removed as much as 45 million barrels of crude oil from global supplies, with a value of more than US$4.5 billion.
However, the fine imposed on the company in place of the suspension was a mere 200,000 rubles (US$3,441).
The successful appeal was undoubtedly a victory for the pipeline company and a relief for European refiners, but for the Kazakhstani government and the foreign oil companies operating there, the threat of future disruption has not gone away.
Flows through the CPC system have been interrupted twice since Russian troops invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24. In late March, the terminal was partially shut for a month after a storm reportedly damaged two of the three loading buoys. In the middle of last month, loadings were again suspended from two moorings for a survey of the surrounding waters, which led to the discovery of a number of World War II mines.
A skeptic might have expected mine removal to have been a priority when the buoys were first installed.
Of even greater concern for European nations, the Kremlin’s hand has been firmly in control of Russia’s gas flows.
For most of last year, deliveries were running at about 400 million cubic meters a day. That abruptly fell by about 25 percent as winter approached, with flows slashed on the Yamal-Europe pipeline through Poland. They dropped again in January, when volumes sent via Ukraine were also severely curtailed.
By last month, total pipeline gas flows from Russia to Europe were down to about 40 percent of normal levels, dropping below 20 percent in the past two weeks, with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline halted for annual maintenance.
Fears that the line directly linking Russia to Germany would not restart once the work was finished have been allayed — for now. Shipments along the route resumed on Thursday, but Putin was quick to warn that they could fall again within days unless a turbine sent to Canada for servicing is returned before one of the others on the line is taken out of service.
The threat of disruptions to gas flows remains very real.
And then there is the deal to allow shipments of grain from Ukraine’s Black Sea ports. While any agreement to restore these vital exports is to be welcomed, be under no illusion that they cannot be halted again at any time. Theft of Ukrainian grain by Russia is well documented, so too is the wanton destruction of crops in the fields.
Russia’s apparent steps back from the brink in all three of these areas should be treated with caution. Just because the weapons have not been used this time, it does not mean they would not appear later.
Just like the nuclear missiles Putin and his backers keep threatening to use, much of the leverage gained by Russia’s ability to cut off food and energy exports lies in the uncertainty created by the possibility of their use, rather than in their actual employment. Once used, although devastating, the threat has gone. By holding them in reserve, the pressure can be maintained almost indefinitely.
Expect Russia to keep threatening oil, gas and agricultural flows as winter approaches, even if it does not curtail them.
Julian Lee is an oil strategist for Bloomberg First Word. Previously, he was a senior analyst at the Centre for Global Energy Studies.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
As Taiwan’s only national university research institute focused on indigenous cultures, it is incredibly regrettable that students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) have continued the horrible history of Taichung Municipal Taichung First Senior High School and National Taiwan University by expressing harmful, discriminatory views and writing defamatory statements against an indigenous university department. Hiding behind anonymous usernames, people have written online about indigenous students from the NDHU College of Indigenous Studies being allowed to light fires in a farmhouse next to the school’s experimental millet fields. The posters bemoan how students in other programs are somehow not permitted to light