Istanbul and Washington are the centers of the Uyghur National Movement in exile. Shinzo Abe, the late former prime minister of Japan, was the most supportive world leader for Uighurs.
“Shinzo Abe was a friend of the oppressed and an enemy of injustice,” World Uyghur Congress (WUC) president Rebiya Kadeer said in a condolence message posted online on July 10.
Siding with the world’s most oppressed nation requires a strong sense of justice from a nation’s leader. It also takes great courage to speak out against one of the world’s most violent national leaders — Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — and recount his mistakes to his face. Kadeer believed Abe cultivated these qualities in himself and contributed not only to the prosperity of Japan, but also to worldwide peace, calling him a “wise, courageous, far-sighted statesman.”
Leaders of Central Asian countries to which Uighurs trace their ancestry have deported, and even murdered, Uighur activists at China’s request. Leaders of Muslim brothers of the Uighurs, such as Egypt and Pakistan, have handed over thousands of Uighur students to China. Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia have also competed for Chinese money by deporting Uighur refugees.
In a written statement, WUC president Dolkun Isa said that Abe “was a genuine ally of the Uyghur people... He helped create the Uyghur Friendship Group in the Japanese Parliament, which is one of the largest parliamentary groups of the Uyghurs in the world today.”
Abe was noted for his frequent meetings with Uighur activists around the world. News archives include photographs of him with dozens of prominent Uighur activists, including Kadeer, Isa, WUC Executive Committee chairman Omer Qanat and Seyit Tumturk. All are considered criminals by China.
Abe was able to show the courage to accept “dangerous” activists that leaders in other countries did not accept because he understood what China is and the threat it poses to the world. He had not forgotten that the Chinese Communist Party had retained its power by suppressing the country’s citizens with tanks in the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. More importantly, he was able to perceive the threat China represents to Japan.
Kutluk Kadeer, who teaches English literature in the Department of Economics and Humanities at the International University of Kagoshima, Japan, talked of the strategic aspect of Abe’s closeness to Uighur activists in addition to the humanitarian point.
“We know from China’s propaganda and policies that its two most dangerous enemies at home are the Uyghurs and the Tibetans; the two most dangerous enemies abroad are the US and Japan,” he said. “Because it has power, China is committing genocide and assimilation of the Uighurs and Tibetans; because it lacks power, China is grinding its teeth and waiting to take action against the US and Japan.”
Abe’s legacy is having created a balanced military position between Japan’s World War II aggression and post-war pacifism. To make this balance, Abe formed the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, set up the Japanese National Security Council, and changed the words and tone of the Murayama Statement. He also upheld the value of human rights by supporting the Uighur cause.
Abe’s special efforts not to ignore the Uighur situation and to encourage Uighur activists to take their case to the international stage was an attempt to create a balance between China and the captured nations within China.
Abe was a leader of balance and a role model for shaping the world power balance. His closeness to and support for Uighurs was another manifestation of this legacy.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur American.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS