Akio Yaita, the Taipei bureau head of Japan’s Sankei Shimbun, is an enthusiastic proponent of closer Taiwan-Japan relations and has long hoped to emulate the Friends of Lee Teng-hui Association in Japan. Last month, the Friends of Abe Association in Japan finally came to fruition.
The original plan was for former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe to travel to Taiwan to attend the association’s inauguration ceremony. Who would have thought that Abe would last week be gunned down? Abe’s untimely departure is a loss that will be borne heavily by Taiwanese, who are acutely aware that he was Japan’s most Taiwan-friendly prime minister.
While in office, Abe’s stance toward Taiwan was unequivocal, with him issuing statements such as: “Taiwan is Japan’s friend,” and “Taiwan shares our fundamental values and is a vital partner and friend of Japan.”
After stepping down as prime minister in 2020, Abe frequently advocated for and expressed opinions on Taiwan, famously stating that: “Taiwan’s problem is Japan’s problem.”
Abe belonged to a political dynasty. The third member of his family to serve as prime minster, he followed in the footsteps of his maternal grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi, and uncle’s father, Eisaku Sato.
Abe’s political lineage is the most anti-China, pro-Taiwan of Japan’s political dynasties. Kishi was the first Japanese prime minister to visit Taiwan after World War II; Sato was the last to visit Taiwan before formal diplomatic relations were severed.
Abe’s achievements are not solely a product of his political pedigree. He had intimate ties with Taiwan and his position toward the nation was guided by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). Lee was a close and valued friend of Abe, who regarded him as his mentor.
After Abe left office after an initial stint as prime minister in 2007, Lee encouraged him to stand again, saying: “Within Japanese politics, only you can be trusted to lead the country; there is nobody else.”
Lee also advised Abe to set Japan on a path toward a “normalized nation” by establishing the Japanese National Security Council and amending the constitution.
Abe was Japan’s longest-serving and strongest post-war prime minister. His greatest contribution was to strengthen Japan’s national security and defense, and build diplomatic alliances in line with the strategic thinking of a normal nation.
Abe accomplished much while in office. This included upgrading the status of the then-Japanese Defense Agency to the Cabinet-level Japanese Ministry of Defense, establishing the National Security Council, changing the interpretation of Article 9 of the constitution — so that Japan could partly exercise the right of collective self-defense — and passing a package of national security legislation.
Lee established the foundations of Taiwan’s democratization movement. Abe inherited Lee’s political legacy by normalizing Japan, transforming the country into a cornerstone of regional security and a friend that Taiwan can rely on.
In an opinion poll conducted by Japanese media organization Nikkei, 91 percent of respondents believed that Japan should prepare to help Taiwan.
That is Abe’s legacy.
Reflecting on Lee, and Abe’s passing, Akio perfectly encapsulated the situation: “Starting today, we must strain every sinew to fill the chasm left by Abe.”
The work to normalize Taiwan must continue. Taiwanese must complete the unfinished business of Lee and Abe, and press on with the pursuit of liberty, democracy, human rights and national sovereignty.
Tommy Lin is director of the Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s