Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe was fatally shot while delivering a campaign speech in Nara, Japan, on the eve of the Japanese House of Councilors elections. The tragic news shocked the world. Abe, who had always been a strong supporter of Taiwan, gained much respect from Taiwanese, who grieve his passing.
Abe was born to a prominent political family. His maternal grandfather Nobusuke Kishi and his great-uncle Eisaku Sato had served as prime ministers, while his father, Shintaro Abe, was a foreign minister.
Shinzo Abe was himself a legendary figure in Japanese politics. When he first took office in 2006 at the age of 52, he was the first prime minister born after World War II and the youngest in the post-war era.
He was also the only politician to have served twice as prime minister since the Heisei era. He was in office for a total of 3,188 days from 2006 to 2007 and 2012 to 2020, making him Japan’s longest-serving prime minister.
When the Great East Japan Earthquake devastated the country in 2011, the then-ruling Democratic Party of Japan was at a loss for what to do. Public anger grew, and a year later it finally erupted.
At a memorial service in 2012 on the first anniversary of the earthquake, Taiwan was not mentioned when the Japanese government expressed appreciation to foreign countries for their assistance. Even though Taiwan made the largest monetary donation of any country, its representative to Japan was not allowed to present flowers on the stage.
The actions drew a public backlash, forcing then-Japanese prime minister Yoshihiko Noda to apologize. Nine months later, Shinzo Abe staged a comeback and returned as prime minister.
After returning to office, Shinzo Abe introduced his “three arrows” economic policy — fiscal stimulus, loose money and structural reform — and revitalized Japan’s stagnant economy. The number of tourists visiting the country surged from a few million per year to more than 30 million in 2019.
In foreign relations, he leaned toward the US and expressed support for Taiwan, while promoting his “prime minister diplomacy,” traveling to nearly 100 countries.
He tried to improve Taiwan-Japan relations despite doubts, and built friendships with former and current Taiwanese presidents, reportedly viewing former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) as a mentor and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as a friend. After he left office in 2020, he still made maintaining stability in the Taiwan Strait his responsibility.
Late last year, Shinzo Abe said that “a Taiwanese emergency is a Japanese emergency, and therefore an emergency for the Japan-US alliance.” On April 12, he also wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times, calling the US’ policy of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan outdated.
In May, US President Joe Biden acknowledged Shinzo Abe’s views after he met with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo. It seems that a Taiwan policy proposed by Shinzo Abe, echoed by Biden and followed by Kishida is taking shape.
This September marks the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Japan and China. When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) congratulated Kishida on his election in October last year, he expressed his hope that the two sides could welcome the historic moment together. The Kishida administration was in a dilemma as Shinzo Abe had reconstructed the triangular relationship among Taiwan, Japan and the US.
We must continue to observe whether Kishida will continue Shinzo Abe’s line after the sudden death of the “shadow warrior.”
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding