Taiwan’s sovereignty claims over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) were reasserted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday after Chinese and Russian vessels sailed near the disputed islands.
The islands are under the administration of Japan, which refers to them as the Senkaku Islands. They sit in the East China Sea about an equal distance from the northeastern coast of Taiwan proper and Ishigaki Island in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture.
Sovereignty over the islands has always been a contentious issue for Taiwan, China and Japan — all of whom make claims to the land — particularly in recent years as China has been ramping up naval incursions into the islands’ waters. Those incursions in recent weeks have been joined by the Russian navy.
The dispute reached a high point in June 2020, when Japan renamed the islands’ administrative area to Tonoshiro Senkaku, a move that Taiwan criticized, saying to the Japan Times that it would “not be conducive to regional peace and stability.”
However, the sovereignty debate is not that recent. In September 2012, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said while visiting Nantou County’s Lugu Township (鹿谷): “This has always been an issue of fishing rights. It is not a sovereignty issue... I really don’t think that ordinary people care about the islets.”
Lee made the argument in response to a proposal by then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) that Taiwan push its sovereignty claim by holding bilateral meetings with China and Japan before engaging in three-party talks with the two countries.
In an opinion piece published in the Taipei Times in 2012, titled “Ma needs Diaoyutai history lesson,” Chinese Culture University professor Lai Fu-shun (賴福順) cited Ma as saying the islands originally belonged to China’s Qing Dynasty and were ceded to Japan under the Treaty of Shimonoseki. Lai rejected this claim, saying that the islands are not mentioned in the treaty, nor are they included in the treaty’s map of Taiwan.
Lai said that no formal claim to the islands was made until Japan did so in 1885, before incorporating them into Okinawa Prefecture in 1890.
However, then-Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Eleanor Wang (王珮玲) said in February 2017: “Since 1971, the US has repeatedly reiterated that the transfer of administrative rights over the Diaoyutai Islands to Japan did not touch upon the sovereignty issue.”
Lee said that “ordinary people” do not care about the Diaoyutai Islands, but protests by Taiwanese over what they see as Japan’s illegal occupation of the territory, as well as numerous attempts by Taiwanese to moor small boats on the islands over the past few decades, suggest otherwise.
For some, the issue could be one of protecting national sovereignty. For others, it could be about the islands’ rich fishing grounds and oil deposits. For others still, it could be about the strategic importance of controlling the Miyako Strait. That last concern is why Taiwan should work with Japan to protect the islands and their surroundings from incursions by an increasingly aggressive China.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Japanese Minister of Defense Nobuo Kishi and other Japanese politicians have spoken on many occasions about the need to protect peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the surrounding region.
This would be best facilitated if Taiwan could put sovereignty disputes on the back burner and approach Japan about sharing access to the Diaoyutais to conduct joint drills and intelligence sharing. In exchange, Taiwan could share access to Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), given the mutual concerns about security in the South China Sea.
Now is not the time to fight over the Diaoyutais. Rather, it would be in Taiwan’s and Japan’s best interests to collaborate on the islands for the purpose of regional security.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS