Malaysia’s economy is cranking up after the COVID-19 pandemic. Land borders with Singapore have reopened, bringing in millions of visitors. Kuala Lumpur’s notorious traffic jams are back and shoppers are flocking to malls. The revival also has a rich irony: So many workers have left for better-paid jobs in the nation’s wealthy southern neighbor that businesses are struggling to meet demand.
From tourism to agriculture, an absence of staff is constraining the recovery. It is also adding to deeper strains in an upper middle-income economy that was once a model for the developing world, but has since suffered from a long-term slowdown in growth — one that started well before COVID-19. To graduate to the next tier of prosperous economies, Malaysia must staunch the flow of talented citizens abroad.
The nation’s ambition is to escape a middle-income trap, where it is less affluent than Singapore, but doing better than neighbors like Indonesia and the Philippines. It is one thing to bring in workers for agriculture, construction and low-to-mid-tier manufacturing. However, Malaysia faces a double whammy: The low-skilled workforce is depleted because of a hiring freeze and border closures during COVID-19, but high-skilled people are likely to resume their exodus.
Malaysia is slowly starting to ease its restraints on hiring. To offset the crunch in the meantime, employers have been engaging locals in work they often shunned: “3D jobs” that are dirty, dangerous and difficult. In the Cameron Highlands, where trucks wait to drive to Singapore with tomatoes, peppers, onions and cucumbers, farmer Louis Lau is using Malaysians for work once sought by foreigners.
“We are facing a big problem,” he told me.
Other sectors do not have the same flexibility. In Penang on the northwest coast, scores of ships that would normally be put to sea for at least a week sit dockside, thanks to a dearth of migrant workers. At the other end of the country, hoteliers in Johor bemoan the gravitational pull of Singapore. The Star newspaper highlighted the saga on its front page recently, with complaints from executives about the scarcity of foreign workers needed to clean rooms, handle check-ins and keep the lights on.
“It is challenging for hotels here to compete with employers in Singapore, as locals can be paid three times higher for doing similar jobs,” Tourism Johor Director Suhairi Hashim told the Star.
After lobbying hard for the bridge links with Singapore to reopen, Johor businesses now find they barely have enough people to unbolt the latch. While Malaysian employers claim the city-state — where GDP per person is among the highest in the world — is sucking in talent, Singapore is suffering a shortfall of its own that sent the unemployment rate to 2.2 percent.
The Singaporean government, which also imposed tough border controls during the pandemic, is trying to ease the backlog. Ministers are urging businesses to hire locals. Dependence on imported workers has become a touchy subject over the past decade, especially after a deep recession in 2020 led to a rare electoral setback for the ruling party. While the foreign workforce has receded over the past two years, it represents more than 20 percent of the population.
Malaysia and Singapore, joined for two tumultuous years in the 1960s, will always be linked economically. Both, in their own way, are increasingly ambivalent about foreign workers. That does little to diminish their need. An aging Malaysia risks stagnating before growing rich. It needs a vibrant employment scene to avoid that fate. Singapore, for all its prowess as a global business center, still needs contractors, bus drivers, construction workers and nurses. Of the two nations, Malaysia’s challenges appear greater. It faces a brain — and brawn — drain, driven by hard-to-extinguish racial preferences that favor ethnic Malay at the expense of minorities.
“A significant share of the country’s most educated and skilled citizens leave the country for lack of opportunities,” said a World Bank report last year that scrutinized the country’s progress toward becoming a high-income country, a goal considered likely to be attained between 2024 and 2028.
One-third of emigrants were highly skilled, accounting for about 20 about of the college-educated domestic population.
Encouraging people to stay will require Malaysia to loosen some of the rigidities that have stymied business activity. A plethora of state-backed firms and nominally private companies run by people close to the government have tentacles in almost every sector, which mitigates against competition. State enterprises tend to be used as national piggy banks to finance politically desirable projects and undertakings that contribute little to the economy’s overall dynamism. Suffice it to say, not exactly aspirational for young graduates.
Foreign workers in Malaysia tend to be low-skilled; relatively few have finished high school. They began filling gaps that opened up in the labor market decades ago, especially manufacturing, and comprised about 15 percent of the workforce prior to the pandemic, the World Bank report said. (There is also a large, but hard to quantify, population of undocumented laborers.)
Malaysia has long aspired to join the ranks of advanced economies and proudly paraded some of the baubles of such status: a domestic auto industry, the world’s tallest building and so on. It would do well to focus on less jazzy, but vital components of success, like a labor market that can drive development in the coming decades, not a relic of the go-go years of the late 20th century.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for economics. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its