A video showing three women being attacked by a group of men in a restaurant in China’s Hebei Province earlier this month went viral on the Chinese Internet, leaving those who have seen it filled with anger.
The attack started when one of the men sexually harassed one of the women. After the three women turned down the man’s advances, he and his friends dragged one of the women outside by her hair, and then stomped on her head, smashed bottles on her body and hit her with chairs.
One day after the video was posted, police announced that they had arrested the nine offenders, saying that they would be brought to justice.
However, there is little credibility to the statement.
As Confucius said: “The country can hardly stand if the people have no trust in it.”
The outrage generated by the attack proves that there is little trust in the Chinese government nor the information Chinese authorities release to the public.
In a society where only one voice can exist, even if the voice for once speaks the truth, the public would believe that it is a lie.
Confusing cause and effect, some people have linked the issue to the highly sensitive topics of women’s rights and “gender confrontation.” The core of the incident is gang violence, not gender. Had the victim been a man, the outrage would not have been as strong.
Personally, I have been on the fence about women’s rights in China, because I believe that women’s rights must be based on human rights. At a time when the most basic human rights are abused in China, what is the point of discussing women’s rights?
Human rights are a universal value that must be defended, and violence against humans must be prosecuted and punished.
Other incidents sparked similar outrage over the past year — from a chained mother of eight in Xuzhou to a woman who was stripped of her clothes on a subway train in Xian, and a woman who was forced into prostitution while searching for a job in Shanghai.
However, the authorities in charge mostly settled the matters by leaving them unsettled.
Was the public furious about the incidents? Although people were angry when the news broke, anger came and went easily. As history keeps repeating itself, people also keep forgetting it.
Looking at China over the past decade or so, rule of law, most freedoms and human rights have slid backward. This is due to ever-tightening controls that are put in place for the sake of what is called “maintaining stability.” It is a stifling environment for artists and those working in the entertainment industry.
Censorship is nothing new in China, but the most recent assaults, and how the authorities dealt with them, brought heartache beyond words. After all, a woman being assaulted is someone’s daughter.
In the case of the restaurant attack, the core of the problem is not that no one stepped in on the woman’s behalf, it is that no one dared to do so, as China’s legal protections for those helping others are insufficient.
It is likely that the nine offenders will be punished severely, as this should serve the Chinese government’s objective to ease public anger.
It would mislead the public to believe that the problem could be solved by punishing those nine individuals. The real problem is not on an individual level, but with a flawed judicial system that fails to fully protect those who step up and act against grave injustice.
Bai Zhao is a freelance artist in Shanghai.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS