Online advertising fraud has become so brazen that some suspicious investment promoters have been using a photograph of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) to lure unsuspecting people to put money into their seemingly foolproof venture.
No matter how many times I report this advertisement as spam, it keeps popping up on my browser.
Fraud cases have topped the list of investigations by local prosecutors’ offices for the past five years, with drug crimes in second place, and the gap is widening quickly, the High Prosecutors’ Office said.
It is true that “technology increases productivity,” but this also applies to fraud. High-tech communication allows fraudsters to peddle their deception across borders, and the Internet facilitates the spread of deceitful information, ready to catch anyone naive enough to take the bait.
Small-loan advertisements stuck to telephone poles can be removed, and the parties behind them penalized. If an account is found to be fraudulent, you can call an anti-fraud hotline to report it.
However, deceptive social media posts and accounts can only be investigated by law enforcement agencies while waiting for Internet platforms to suspend the enterprise. There is no law or regulation to prevent this activity from happening in the first place.
The concept of environmental, social and corporate governance has become a selling point for companies to bandy around in promotions, but when it comes to Internet security, most of the tech giants shut their eyes as if the matter is outside their jurisdiction. These corporations make Internet users take responsibility for screening out suspicous ads.
In light of increasing incidents, Google Taiwan is making investment service advertisers obtain authorization from the Financial Supervisory Commission before publishing their advertisments.
The rule seems strong, but fraudsters are more than up to the challenge. If they change tack and begin posting fraudulent part-time job ads, would Google require these advertisers to require Ministry of Labor permission?
Countries cannot rely on Internet operators to handle such situations on their own. This is why Europe and the US are beginning to update relevant laws and regulations.
The Online Safety Bill under review in the UK would oblige Internet operators to review ads for content that should be removed, and the Kids Online Safety Act proposed in the US has been designed to oversee children’s consumption of social media.
These bills are not only a tightening of Internet content rules, but also relate to information security. They establish authorities and regulations to ensure that Internet operators review content thoroughly — and remove suspicious publicity.
Taiwan could learn from these bills. Article 2, Paragraph 5 of the Organization Act of the Ministry of Culture (數位發展部組織法) says that the soon-to-be-launched Ministry of Digital Development is to manage the formulation, guidance and supervision of matters related to national information security policies, regulations, planning and resource allocation.
The new ministry could use its authority to legislate appropriate Internet content security measures.
It is time that steps are taken to ensure that fraudulent online messaging is blocked in a timely manner and under an appropriate legal framework so that the public can enjoy a safe and secure online environment.
Chuang Chia-wei is a district prosecutor in Miaoli.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers