The death of a two-year-old boy nicknamed En En (恩恩) in New Taipei City’s Jhonghe District (中和) caused public outrage and people to blame the city’s mayor.
Like me, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) is from Chiayi County’s Puzi City (朴子). When former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was Taipei mayor, Hou was commissioner of the Taipei Police Department’s Criminal Investigation Division and I was commissioner of the city’s Department of Health. As commissioners, we attended the city’s Police and Sanitation Committee meetings, and we helped with each other’s duties on numerous occasions. We also worked together on the murder case of Pai Hsiao-yen (白曉燕).
When Chen became president, Hou was promoted to director-general of the National Police Agency and I became minister of health and welfare — it is fair to say that we go back a long way.
As a former mayor of Chiayi City, I would like to give Hou some recommendations on disease prevention measures, although I do not really expect them to be implemented.
First, under the Communicable Disease Control Act (傳染病防治法), the local epidemic commander is neither the Department of Health commissioner nor the Fire Department commissioner, but the mayor. Hence, I urge Hou to stop passing the buck, because the responsibility is his and his alone.
Second, all fire department and health department personnel have spared no effort in curbing COVID-19, so Hou should not shift the responsibility to his subordinates.
Third, I would suggest Hou face up to the reality that just as there are diligent staff, there are also those who coast and do not pull their weight in the workplace. To boost morale, Hou should adopt a reward-and-punishment approach — as maintaining strict discipline is also part of a mayor’s duties.
Fourth, the En En incident is an opportunity for the local government to review its emergency care system. If there were not enough personnel to handle the case, Hou should recruit retired or volunteer workers.
If certain workers were derelict in their duties or negligent, Hou should discipline them fairly. Failure to do so would only undermine workplace culture and efficiency.
Fifth, Hou should use this incident as an opportunity for reform, and avoid using bureaucracy to fend off En En’s father and public criticism. The local government should not have abused its authority and public resources by ordering firefighters to participate in an alleged act of deception, neither should it deploy cyberarmies to attack En En’s father.
Sixth, Hou should not allow fellow members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to turn the father’s pursuit of truth into a political maneuver. A child’s death is the last thing anyone wants to see, and En En’s death should not be mixed up with politics. Deepening political divisions does not work in Hou’s favor, because the “deep blue” camp dislikes him regardless.
Seventh, Hou should stop withholding the rest of the audio files from the public. The best approach would be to improve the admissions procedure and the emergency system, eliminate the red tape, and offer a formal and sincere apology to En En’s father.
The incident should open the door to change and help a father grieving for his lost child. If Hou shoulders the burden of being a leader, En En’s death will not have been for nothing.
Twu Shiing-jer is chairman of the Development Center for Biotechnology, a former minister of health and welfare, and founding chairman of Taiwan Immunization Vision and Strategy.
Translated by Rita Wang
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS