I was studying in Japan when the 1989 student-led democracy movement broke out in China, culminating in the violent suppression on June 4 of students camped out in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square.
At the time, Chinese students in Japan wanted to hold a demonstration, but on June 9, then-Chinese premier Li Peng (李鵬) appeared on television, warning Chinese students in other countries not to take part in protests and saying that they would be responsible for any serious consequences if they did so.
He also said that anyone who informed on protesters would be well rewarded.
This made the students responsible for planning the protest rather apprehensive and, after a heated discussion, they phoned the police and reporters to say that the protest march planned for June 10 had been canceled.
Nonetheless, when June 10 arrived, an impressive crowd of people turned up at the student dormitories.
The crowd of people said that the demonstration should go ahead as originally planned, and to hell with Li Peng’s warning.
FOREIGN SUPPORT
Among them were many Japanese people, with children, women and students among them. People of various other nationalities such as British, US, German, French, Thai, Indonesian, Malaysian, Filipino and Taiwanese also converged on the foreign students’ dormitories.
They were willing to march on behalf of the Chinese students, and they said that even if they could not protest, they could mourn instead.
FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY
A woman with graying hair said indignantly: “We must not let the blood of June 4 be shed in vain. Such things have happened in Japan in the past, but we have come through it. Democracy has to be fought for, and China is no exception. How can you give up at this critical moment? If Japan could do it, why not China? Please don’t let us down.”
Many reporters were arriving on the scene. A group of people who had come to cheer for the students held handmade signs with slogans such as “China needs democracy,” “We support the student democracy movement,” “Who are the executioners of Chinese democracy?” and “[then-paramount leader of China] Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and Li Peng should resign and apologize for June 4.”
There were signs in Chinese, English and Japanese, written horizontally and vertically, like banners on a battlefield. These supporters’ enthusiasm finally moved the Chinese students, who decided to hold a silent protest march.
The route was short — just 2km from the school to a park, but the procession was orderly, with people joining up as it went along and some unable to hold back tears.
ETHICAL JOURNALISM
The reporters accompanying the march mostly tried to get pictures of fair-haired or dark-skinned foreigners. If they photographed Chinese students, they did so from behind to avoid showing their faces. News of the event was broadcast on television that evening.
June 4 each year reminds me of this protest march that I witnessed while studying in Japan.
The support shown on that day proves that “virtue will not be left to stand alone.”
I also observed the self-discipline of journalists — the fourth estate — in free and democratic Japan. It is people such as these that keep the June 4 candles burning.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS