EV charging policy
I have read the news about Taiwan Power Co introducing its first policy on the charging of electric vehicles (EVs) during peak hours. I support the idea that electricity use for vehicles should cost more. To prevent blackouts in peak hours, it is necessary for the government to come up with new methods to apportion electricity use.
The Motor Vehicles Office has said that about 68,000 electrified vehicles were sold last year, including 58,000 hybrid electric vehicles and 10,000 battery electric vehicles, an annual growth rate of 42.4 percent and 14.4 percent respectively. This means that as the number of EVs increases each year, a larger proportion of electricity is to go toward charging them. Also, there have been cases when vehicle owners charged their batteries during peak hours and caused blackouts in entire buildings. As a result, electricity shortages are an issue during those times.
Under the new policy, drivers would pay four times more during peak hours, which apparently would discourage them from charging their vehicles during those hours.
Based on the results of increasing tolls on national highways during peak hours and on weekends, I think that having different prices for peak and off-peak hours is a good way to release pressure on the electric power system.
Taiwan needs more policies that deal with the increasing number of EVs, and this is a good start. In addition to the newly announced policy, I also suggest that EV owners install energy management systems to track whether there are too many vehicles charging at the same time, and prevent power shortages or outages from happening.
Florance Lin
Taipei
A voice for Mudan
The article “Statues in Mudan to help tell Paiwan version of incident” (Taipei Times, May 27, page 2) showed the importance of transitional justice for indigenous ancestors and their descendants.
Mudan Mayor Pan Chuang-chih (潘壯志) has said that the facts behind the Mudan Incident between Paiwan and Japanese colonists are not well-known among Taiwanese. Hence, the government has a responsibility to reveal the truth and promote transitional justice on behalf of underrepresented people. I strongly agree with Pan’s perspective and the movement to establish ancestors’ statues in the community as a means to implement transitional justice.
Thanks to transitional justice, minority groups can finally receive compensation and a formal apology from the government — and their stories are no longer regarded as taboo or unsubstantiated rumor.
A good example of this is the 228 Massacre. After many decades of silence, the victims and relatives were finally able to provide eyewitness testimony of the Incident. People can now discover different perspectives on the massacre through works of literature, documentaries and historical research reports.
As Pan said: “At a time when the government is focused on transitional justice, there is a responsibility to give a voice to the ancestors of Mudan.”
Transitional justice is an essential process, not only for healing and easing the pain of victims, but also to achieve justice for innocent people wrongly accused and to shed light on untold truths muzzled by oppressive regimes. It prevents the recurrence of human rights abuses, promotes academic discovery and historical research, and, above all, uncovers the truth.
Thus, armed with the purpose of accurately acknowledging and recording the past, transitional justice is necessary for ancestors and their descendants.
Maggie Hsu
Pingtung County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing