Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) dropped a bombshell announcement on Wednesday last week: The party is nominating former premier Simon Chang (張善政) as its candidate for Taoyuan mayor.
The nomination might have come as a surprise to the public, but it completely ambushed the KMT local factions in Taoyuan. Chang was not considered as, or even rumored to be, a potential candidate right up to the announcement.
The list of candidates expected for nomination were KMT legislators Lu Yu-ling (呂玉玲), Lu Ming-che (魯明哲) and Wan Mei-ling (萬美玲), and former KMT Taipei city councilor Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強).
Lo had expressed his intention to run more than a month earlier, but his proposal was met with strong opposition from local factions. Chu reportedly ordered Lo to back out of the race, as he would “never, ever nominate” him.
Believing himself to be as strong a candidate as the others, Lo moved to Taoyuan and resigned as a councilor to demonstrate his resolve.
The KMT gave subtle or direct hints that misled other candidates into running, with many believing that a decision would be made in July.
Lu Yu-ling — endorsed by Taoyuan City Council Speaker Chiu Yi-sheng (邱奕勝) — started putting up billboards with encouragement from the party.
Lu Ming-che, who had the highest approval ratings in opinion polls, also gave his consent if he were to be enlisted by the party.
As a result, the announcement of Chang’s nomination created a backlash, leaving the hopeful candidates reeling. Chiu even left the KMT’s Line groups to express his ire.
So far, Chu’s nomination of Chang can be seen as either the greatest gamble in his political career or his dumbest move as a KMT leader.
With the nomination, Chu is tying his political career to a Chang election victory. If Chang wins in November, then all hail Chu as the omniscient leader, but if he fails, it would be “goodbye Chu.”
On the surface, the move seemed “cunning,” killing three birds with one stone.
First, Lo, a “troublemaker” who refused to heed direct orders from the party, was eliminated. As the nomination came after Lo resigned as councilor, it is hard not to view this as Chu carrying out a personal vendetta, showing his authority over Lo’s insubordination.
Second, the move puts pressure on Chiu. As the head of a local faction, most legislators, city councilors and organizations look to Chiu as their leader, but he has been forced into a position where he must endorse Chang or risk being labeled a “nonadherent.”
Finally, it integrated the voices of the local factions, which favored different candidates. Chu is seeking to keep the factions in line by pushing forward a candidate who stands above the fray.
Chu is eager for the KMT to take back the city from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Despite the KMT’s repeated assertions about the importance of party unity, Chu’s move has only created more chaos for it.
Chang would need to look to Chiu and the local factions to help run his campaign, but Chu’s ruthless maneuver will only win Chang lukewarm support or a cold shoulder.
Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) of the DPP has had a decent approval rating, so the KMT will need the support of local factions if Chang is to win.
Now that Chu has opened up a can of worms with Chang’s nomination, he will have to quickly mop up the mess to set the campaign on a winning track.
Chu has never been a strong leader, but the fiasco in Taoyuan has only exposed him as nothing more than a paper tiger.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under