Taiwanese democracy advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲), imprisoned by Chinese authorities on false charges, was finally released and returned to Taiwan last month. A human rights advocate, Lee was charged with “subversion of state power” and sentenced to five years behind bars.
There is also the case of Morrison Lee (李孟居), a political consultant to Pingtung County’s Fangliao Township (枋寮), who was accused of espionage by the Chinese authorities, sentenced to 22 months in prison and deprived of his “political rights” (prevented from leaving China) for a further two years.
To date, Morrison Lee has been detained in China for nearly three years and there are no signs that the Chinese Communist Party intends to release him any time soon.
Contrast this treatment with that of the New Party’s Wang Ping-chung (王炳忠) and other party members who allegedly received funding from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office to set up organizations in Taiwan.
Although the alleged spy ring was suspected of collecting information relating to serving and retired members of the military and civil servants, as they had not yet recruited anyone, prosecutors had insufficient evidence to prove that the actions of Wang and the others constituted a clear and present threat to national security. For this reason, the group was acquitted at both the initial trial and a subsequent appeal.
The difference between Taiwan’s and China’s judicial systems is like night and day.
As a liberal democracy, the common phrase “no bending of the law and no indulgence of criminality (勿枉勿縱)” perfectly encapsulates the spirit of Taiwan’s judicial system. However, with an enemy on the other side of the Taiwan Strait that could launch an invasion at any moment, Taiwan’s judiciary often appears utterly ignorant of the threat facing the nation.
Local media have reported that many members of Taiwan’s legal system believe that the verdicts of judges are a means by which to “encourage” just verdicts from their opposite numbers in China. This means going soft on Chinese agents who infiltrate Taiwanese society under the guise of friendship.
The problem with this overly lenient attitude is that as soon as a clear and present danger does present itself, it would be too late to do anything about it.
Late democracy pioneer Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) once wrote that interaction with China must be based upon the principle of equality and reciprocity: Whatever China is allowed to do in Taiwan, Taiwan should also be able to do in China.
Conversely, whatever Taiwan cannot do in China, China should not be allowed to do in Taiwan, Peng said.
This is an absolutely fundamental principle.
Looked at another way: Do the verdicts of Taiwan’s judges place too little value on upholding Taiwan’s democracy and its freedoms? And has the government been forceful enough in its condemnation of China’s unjust incarceration of Taiwanese?
Upholding the values of Taiwan’s liberal democracy requires the rigorous application of the law. When a Taiwanese court hears a case involving a pro-China individual or group stirring up trouble in society, it almost always ends in a light sentence or an acquittal. Each time a lenient verdict is handed down in such cases, this causes unease among the public.
Upholding freedom and democracy is the responsibility of everyone. In carrying out their work, judges must take care not to throw away our hard-won liberties by allowing others to abuse the very rights that are meant to protect us.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor in the Department of Applied Japanese at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Edward Jones
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US