Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, is spending US$44 billion to acquire Twitter with the stated aim of turning it into a haven for “free speech.”
There is just one problem: The social platform has been down this road before, and it did not end well.
A decade ago, a Twitter executive dubbed the company “the free speech wing of the free speech party” to underscore its commitment to untrammeled freedom of expression. Subsequent events put that moniker to the test, as repressive regimes cracked down on Twitter users, particularly in the wake of the short-lived “Arab Spring” demonstrations.
In the US, a visceral 2014 article by journalist Amanda Hess exposed the incessant, vile harassment many women faced just for posting on Twitter or other online forums.
Over the subsequent years, Twitter learned a few things about the consequences of running a largely unmoderated social platform — one of the most important being that companies generally do not want their ads running against violent threats, hate speech that bleeds into incitement, and misinformation that aims to tip elections or undermine public health.
“With Musk, his posturing of free speech — just leave everything up — that would be bad in and of itself,” said Paul Barrett, deputy director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University. “If you stop moderating with automated systems and human reviews, a site like Twitter, in the space of a short period of time, you would have a cesspool.”
Google quickly learned this lesson the hard way when major companies such as Toyota and Anheuser-Busch yanked their ads after they ran ahead of YouTube videos produced by extremists in 2015, Barrett said.
Once it was clear just how unhealthy the conversation had gotten, Twitter cofounder and former chief executive officer Jack Dorsey spent years trying to improve what he called the “health” of the conversation on the platform.
The company was an early adopter of the “report abuse” button after UK member of parliament Stella Creasy received a barrage of rape and death threats on the platform. The online abuse was the result of a seemingly positive post in support of feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez, who successfully advocated for novelist Jane Austen to appear on a British banknote. Creasy’s online harasser was sent to prison for 18 weeks.
Twitter has continued to craft rules and invested in staff and technology that detect violent threats, harassment and misinformation that contravenes its policies. After evidence emerged that Russia used the platforms to try to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election, social media companies also stepped up their efforts against political misinformation.
The big question now is how far Musk, who describes himself as a “free-speech absolutist,” wants to ratchet back these systems — and whether users and advertisers will stick around if he does.
Even now, Americans say they are more likely to be harassed on social media than any other online forum, with women, people of color and LGBTQ users reporting a disproportionate amount of that abuse.
About 80 percent of users believe that the companies are still doing only a “fair or poor” job of handling that harassment, a Pew Research Center survey of US adults last year showed.
Meanwhile, terms such as “censorship” and “free speech” have turned into political rallying cries for conservatives, frustrated by seeing right-leaning commentators and high-profile Republican officials booted off Facebook and Twitter for breaching the rules.
Musk appeared to criticize Twitter’s permanent ban of then-US president Donald Trump last year for messages that the tech company said helped incite the insurrection at the US Capitol on Jan. 6 last year.
“A lot of people are going to be super unhappy with West Coast high tech as the de facto arbiter of free speech,” Musk wrote on Twitter days after Trump was banned from Facebook and Twitter.
Trump’s allies, including his son Donald Trump Jr, have even pleaded for Musk to buy out the company.
“If Elon Musk can privately send people into space I’m sure he can design a social network that isn’t biased,” Trump Jr said in the caption of a video posted to Instagram in April last year.
Kirsten Martin, a professor of technology ethics at the University of Notre Dame, said that Twitter has consistently worked at being a “responsible” social media company through its moderation system, its hires in the area of machine learning ethics and in whom it allows to do research on the platform.
The fact that Musk wants to change that suggests that he is focused on “irresponsible social media,” Martin said.
Twitter declined to comment for this story.
A representative for Musk did not immediately respond to a message for comment.
New social media apps targeted at conservatives, including former president Donald Trump’s Truth Social, have not come remotely close to matching the success of Facebook or Twitter. That is partly because Republican politicians and causes already draw large audiences on existing and much better established platforms.
It is also partly due to floods of inflammatory, false or violent posts.
Last year, for example, right-wing social media site Parler was nearly wiped off the Internet when it became evident that rioters had used the app to promote violent messages and organize the Jan. 6 siege of the US Capitol.
Apple and Google barred its app from their online stores, while Amazon stopped providing Web-hosting services for the site.
Musk himself regularly blocks social media users who have criticized him or his company, and sometimes bullies reporters who have written critical articles about him or Tesla.
He regularly tweets at reporters who write about his company, sometimes mischaracterizing their work as “false” or “misleading.”
His popular posts typically send a swarm of his social media fans directly to the accounts of the reporters to harass them for hours or days.
“I only block people as a direct insult,” Musk wrote on Twitter in 2020, responding to a post from a reporter.
Evan Greer, a political activist with Fight for the Future, said that Musk’s lack of experience in moderating an influential social media platform would be a problem if he successfully takes over the company.
“If we want to protect free speech online, then we can’t live in a world where the richest person on Earth can just purchase a platform that millions of people depend on and then change the rules to his liking,” Greer said.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS