Russia’s war in Ukraine has lasted almost two months and caused a tragic loss of civilian life. The world’s media have fully covered the money and supplies donated by the US and European countries, but many are surprised by the aid that Japan, a country far off in East Asia, has given.
Media reports say that Japan has so far given US$300 million in humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and continues to put diplomatic and economic pressure on Russia.
Compared with India’s policy of self-preservation, Japan was the first Asian country to stand up and criticize Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. In addition to introducing economic sanctions against Russia, Japan has also provided humanitarian aid to the victims of Russia’s aggression.
On April 5, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Yoshimasa Hayashi arranged to carry 20 Ukrainian refugees — five men and 15 women, aged between six and 66 — to Japan on a government plane. Four of the refugees had no relatives in Japan or a significant reason to be allowed entry, but the Japanese government welcomed them.
Tokyo expressed outrage over the massacre perpetrated by Russian forces in Bucha, a town near the capital, Kyiv. At a news conference on April 8, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida condemned the Russian forces’ cruelty and inhumane actions, saying that the international community would not tolerate war crimes.
Kishida said that Russia should be held accountable for the violence it had unleashed, and that Tokyo supported an independent investigation by the International Criminal Court and the UN, with Japan paying in advance its contribution to the court to help it investigate alleged war crimes.
Although a Russian jet entered Japanese airspace early last month, Japan was not intimidated, but extended economic sanctions against Russia. Japan has not only imposed five new sanctions — including banning imports of Russian coal, wood, machinery and vodka — but on Thursday last week, the Japanese Diet voted to revoke Russia’s most favored nation status.
On April 17, Kyodo News announced the results of a survey saying that even if the sanctions against Russia were to have a serious impact on the economy and daily life in Japan, 73.7 percent of respondents supported the government maintaining economic sanctions against Russia.
Japan is prevented by law from providing Ukraine with the major weaponry — heavy artillery, tanks, helicopters and missiles — that the US and European countries have, but the terms of the Self-Defense Forces Act and the “three principles on transfer of defense equipment and technology” allow it to provide Ukrainians with large amounts of non-lethal equipment — such as bulletproof clothing, military helmets, clothing and tents, as well as food, cameras, toiletries and generators — to help them in their efforts to defeat the enemy.
Japan, which has a mutual security agreement the US, has reiterated the importance of maintaining stability across the Taiwan Strait. It is concerned over deepening ties between China and Russia, and believes that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine poses a threat to security not only in Europe, but also throughout the world.
Japan is aware that only by supporting Ukraine and doing its best to frustrate Russian aggression can it hope to prevent Chinese aggression toward Taiwan — which it knows it would get involved in.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Paul Cooper
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS