How important are names? Well, that depends.
The old question of Taiwan’s name resurfaced again when Chen Zhen (陳蓁), a Chinese adjunct (part time) professor at the Polytechnic University of Milan, recently bullied a Taiwanese student into changing the name of his country of origin on his thesis.
Chen pressured him to change it from “Taipei, Taiwan,” to “Taipei, China.”
So, how important are names, especially the accuracy of one’s country of origin on an academic thesis?
Anyone who has visited a baseball game has probably heard vendors advertise their products: “You cannot tell the players without a scorecard.”
In baseball games, the players’ uniforms only have numbers on them, so scorecards tell you the players’ names.
How important are names?
We get more clarity on the name-game in Lewis Carroll’s novel Through the Looking-Glass, when Alice meets Humpty Dumpty, who tells her that he thinks she has a “stupid name” and then asks: “What does it mean?”
When Alice says that words and names can have different meanings, Humpty Dumpty counters her by saying that the most important thing is “to be master — that’s all.”
That brings us back to the professor and the student, and Taiwan.
When it comes to countries and places of origin, names do matter, especially for Taiwan with its complicated history and desired valuable location.
How is Taiwan to be named?
Who should name it? What does it mean? Who is to be master?
Taiwan is a de facto independent nation. It meets all the standards of the Montevideo Convention and more. It has a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to conduct international relations. It also issues and collects its own taxes, and has a standing army.
The Montevideo Convention stipulates that a nation does not have to be recognized by other nations to be a nation.
At present, Taiwan is officially recognized by only 14 UN member states, and that is where the complications begin.
Ironically, 146 of the UN countries that do not officially recognize Taiwan, do recognize Taiwan’s passport and give its citizens visa-free entry.
However, only 80 of those same countries give visa-free entry to Chinese passport holders.
The professor might have reviewed that reality and how Taiwan far outranks China when he tried to argue that European nations do not recognize Taiwan.
The UN complications date back to 1971, when UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed, specifically dismissing the followers of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) from the body.
In that dismissal, no mention was made of the Republic of China (ROC) or Taiwan.
It only addressed Chiang’s followers and the matter of who represented China. It did not answer who represents Taiwan, and whether Taiwan is part of China. Thus, while the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would like to read it that way, others obviously do not.
Taiwan has had many names. Formosa is one of the oldest and most popular. Its origin dates back to the 16th century when a Portuguese ship sailing from Hong Kong to Japan’s Nagasaki passed close enough to it for those on board to speak of it as “Ihla Formosa,” the beautiful island.
That name stayed with it for centuries and subsequently appeared on most Western seafaring maps. It continued to be used into the 20th century.
Then-US senator John F. Kennedy spoke of the Formosan situation in the debates before the 1960 US presidential election.
Today, Formosa has become out of fashion and recalls a bygone era.
In the Olympics, Taiwan’s situation is more complicated, and the nation has participated in the Games under a potpourri of names.
Before the end of World War II, if anyone from Taiwan would have gone, they would have been part of the Japanese team, as Taiwan was a Japanese colony at that time.
In 1948, Taiwanese participated as athletes from the ROC, but in 1960, that surprisingly changed to Formosa. From 1964 to 1968, again surprisingly, the athletes participated under the name Taiwan, and from 1972 to 1976, representation reverted back to the ROC.
After that, because of protests from China, Taiwanese authorities would boycott the Olympics until 1984, when it participated under the innocuous compromise name of “Chinese Taipei,” a name it has used to the present.
However, if the Olympics are in Japan, Japan does not recognize or use that name.
So what is in a name?
If one examines the Constitution, Taiwan’s official name has been the ROC since 1947, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) brought the Constitution with it to its exile in Taiwan after losing the Chinese Civil War and imposed it on the former Japanese colony.
However, Taiwan’s new passport design bears the name “Taiwan” in bold letters, while the name “ROC” is so minuscule that one almost needs a magnifying glass to read it.
The US also uses the name Taiwan when referring to the nation. When the US switched its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979, the US formally acknowledged that the CCP had become the legitimate ruler of China, and it dropped any usage of the “ROC.”
However, the US did not include Taiwan as part of the newly recognized China. Instead, it created the American Institute in Taiwan, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), the Taiwan Travel Act and other pieces of legislation, all using “Taiwan” and avoiding any reference to the ROC.
In accordance with the TRA, Taiwan’s Coordination Council for North American Affairs became the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US, continuing to handle cultural, commercial and other relations with the US, but as an unofficial embassy.
At that time, the US also began to develop its “one China” policy as opposed to Beijing’s “one China” principle. Under that policy, the US does not recognize Taiwan as part of China.
All the complications of this name-game are a result of the can of worms left over from the 1952 San Francisco Peace Treaty, which formally ended the war in the Pacific. There Japan gave up sovereignty over Taiwan, but did not state to whom it surrendered it. It did not mention the ROC or the People’s Republic of China, so that one group, the Taiwan Civil Government, claimed that Taiwan still belonged to the US.
This also leaves open the possibility that Taiwan could be given to its own inhabitants, as stated in the UN’s rules for former colonies.
To add to this confusion, the official US position on Taiwan since the end of World War II has unfortunately remained “undetermined.”
Trade with Taiwan also presents nomenclature challenges.
Lithuania last year broke the ice and allowed the opening of the Taiwanese Representative Office in Lithuania, instead of an office bearing the name “Taipei,” as is used by many other countries trading with Taiwan. This slight switch sparked Beijing’s protest.
The CCP is still trying to control the discourse on Taiwan and insists on referring to Taiwan as “Taiwan, Province of China.” It then uses dollar diplomacy and the promise of lucrative trade opportunities to cajole other nations to deny Taiwan its name.
Confusing? In many ways it is. As a result, when reading about Taiwan, one almost needs a “supplementary scorecard” to determine what is the name reference and who is making it.
In today’s world, Humpty Dumpty would probably say that the name “Chinese Taipei” is “stupid.” It represents an attempt to reach a compromise with a China that was created after World War II and has no legitimate claim to Taiwan.
That brings us to Humpty Dumpty’s final question of who is to be master.
This is where the Taiwanese come in. They cannot change how others perceive them, but they can help changing matters of their name, as they did with the new passport design. It is a step-by-step process, and the next step for Taiwan is to dump its Constitution and its formal name, as well as all the baggage that comes with it.
Later this year, Taiwanese are to vote on a constitutional amendment that would lower the voting age to 18. Those 18-year-olds will have to live with Taiwan’s name, so they should be given the right to vote.
Should that amendment pass, the next step would be to bring the Constitution in line with the reality of Taiwan’s situation.
It is up to Taiwanese to determine their true name.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS