More than a month after Russia invaded Ukraine, the Russian army has not only failed to win a military victory, but has suffered major defeats in public opinion and international relations.
International observers have gradually shifted from expecting certain defeat for Ukraine to praising its stubborn resistance, and some say it might even win the war. In view of this dramatic turnaround, as well as admiring Ukrainians’ will to resist, even more praise is due to the Ukrainian government and armed forces for successful psychological and intelligence operations, which demonstrate the importance of all-out national defense.
Although relations across the Taiwan Strait are not directly comparable to those between Russia and Ukraine, there are some lessons to be learned from the Ukrainian model.
First, the importance of establishing faith in key leaders.
Although Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has often been derided as a “selfie president,” during the war his personal videos and sincere speeches have been straightforward and effective. Coming from the president himself, this has encouraged Ukrainians’ patriotism. It can be compared to Taiwan’s situation in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung’s (陳時中) leadership inspired the whole nation to mobilize against the virus.
Second, the pre-emptive use of military-civilian hybrid warfare.
Ukraine has repeatedly used hybrid warfare methods, such as proclaiming the supposed outstanding military exploits of the “Ghost of Kyiv,” the “13 soldiers of Snake Island” and the “Chonker of Donetsk”; setting up a hotline and Web site for people to inquire about Russian prisoners of war; and releasing videos of the “emotional outbursts” of captured Russian troops. These have all served to undermine Russian morale and foster anti-war sentiment in Russia.
The targets of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) hybrid warfare tactics against Taiwan, such as its cognitive warfare and psychological operations, extend beyond Taiwan’s armed forces to society as a whole. In response, as well as setting up integrated hybrid warfare Web sites to refute rumors spread by the CCP, Taiwan should encourage civic groups to learn about hybrid warfare techniques, thus enabling them to assist military forces.
Third, combining military and psychological operations.
On March 1, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that it would strike targets in Kyiv, namely the 72nd Main Center for Information and Psychological Operations (PSO) and technological facilities of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). Although the PSO’s exact mission and responsibilities are not clear, that it was named alongside the SBU highlights the importance of psychological operations in a war. Accordingly, Taiwan should reassess and strengthen the professionalism and capacity of its psychological operations and integrate them with all levels of the military, so as to use psychological operations to the greatest effect and strengthen overall national defense.
It is still uncertain how the conflict in Ukraine will end, but clearly if the Ukrainians had started out by expecting foreign aid, the war might have come to the quick end that Russia expected. As Sun Tzu (孫子) wrote in The Art of War: “The art of war teaches us to rely not on the likelihood of the enemy’s not coming, but on our own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of his not attacking, but rather on the fact that we have made our position unassailable.”
The ominous situation now prevailing across the Taiwan Strait makes it more important than ever for the government to make adequate preparations.
Wang Ruei-hong is a graduate student at National Defense University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS