Speaking at the “future — southern — youth” forum organized by the National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) Graduate Student Association on Monday last week, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), a NCKU alumnus, asked the 140 students in attendance what kind of person they wanted to be.
More than 40 percent of them unexpectedly said “tang ping” (躺平) — a buzzword originating from China that literally means “lie down flat.”
One of the reasons students gave for the response was the high cost of buying a home in Taiwan.
Many young Taiwanese do not aspire to buy a home, a vehicle or many consumer goods, and have no plans to get married or have children. They do not intend to work any harder than what is needed to support a minimum standard of living, because they think that no matter how hard people work, their salary would be low and never increase enough to catch up with sky-high home prices and the rising cost of consumer goods.
That being the case, what is the point of working hard?
For them, the old advice that “as long as you work hard, you will succeed” is no longer worth listening to.
Home prices in Taiwan are indeed very high — so high that salaries are left far behind. Some people win without trying because they were born to the right parents and inherit a home, but for many of those who cannot buy a home even after slaving away for decades while going hungry, it is understandable that they give up hope.
They might as well lie down flat. After all, if everyone chooses to do so, property prices might even start to fall.
Frankly, who are we to say whether young people’s way of thinking is right or wrong?
In my case, I have been working for 15 years, but although I have joined the middle class, it would be extremely hard for me to buy a home from my own income alone. My salary has only gone up 10 percent over the past five years, while home prices have risen three times as fast.
Consequently, my real income has nowhere near kept up with soaring house prices. If I put down a deposit on a home, I will be a “mortgage slave” for the rest of my life.
It would be better to stay single, treat myself a bit better and allow myself to spend some money on little pleasures. I could spend it on personal leisure and interests, or invest it in learning new skills. When you see it like that, lying down flat does not necessarily mean admitting defeat.
When Lai saw how many of the young generation advocate lying down flat, he assured the students that Taiwan has a hopeful future.
He encouraged them to care about international society, look ahead and pursue their dreams.
However, Taiwan’s falling birthrate and the trend of lying down flat are national security crises.
To have any hope of maintaining Taiwan’s competitive edge, the government must take the bull by the horns, and propose clearer and more convincing policies.
To do so would not only bolster national security, but also give young people a future worth dreaming about.
Dino Wei is an information engineer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS