As someone born and raised in New Hampshire, a small state in the US, it was surprising that the first time I heard of Renny Cushing, a US politician, was when I began my work on researching the death penalty in Taiwan. Renny was a member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives as a Democrat from the town of Hampton. First elected in 1996, he served nine non-consecutive terms.
The Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) has had a long relationship with Renny and his humanitarian efforts. His own organization, Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights (MVFHR), was a sister abolition organization of the TAEDP.
That I came to know Renny halfway across the globe goes to show the large and sweeping effects that he had during his life. From his endeavors to lower the voting age in his state to protesting nuclear power, Renny was a revolutionary. His impact on the death penalty was one of his greatest battles, though.
Renny had opposed the death penalty for a long time, but after his father was murdered in 1988, his stance on abolishing the death penalty became even more prevalent. The night of the murder, a disgruntled off-duty police officer appeared on the Cushings’ doorstep. When Robert R. Cushing Sr, Renny’s father, opened the door, the officer raised his gun and shot him. There, in the entrance to their home, Renny’s father passed away. Afterward, when the public approached him, they strongly pushed for the officer to be sentenced to death.
Renny felt differently. He showed the world that a victim’s family member, despite the tragedy experienced, should not lose their ability to maintain their values. He gave families agency and a voice to take ownership of their story. Renny demonstrated this core value by moving into the home his father was murdered in, raising his three children and eventually passing there.
In 2019, with Renny the head of the movement, New Hampshire finally appealed the death penalty.
Elizabeth Zitrin, another life-long advocate for abolishing the death penalty, said: “He worked in an area primarily where there is so much pain, heartbreak and violence, and he used his personal power and empathy to be able to articulately express that creating more violence and more pain cannot be the answer.”
“We lost a real fighter in our mission,” said Toshi Kazama, a photographer and the MVFHR Asia director.
For Renny, his fight was real, and it was powerful. A story he told Toshi illuminates the origins of his driving force to end the death penalty.
Robert Cushing Sr was a soldier who fought in the Battle of Iwo Jima. He took Renny to Japan while he was younger and told him the story of the horrendous battle. The words that became engraved in Renny from that trip were “all the blood was wasted on that island.”
Robert Cushing Sr’s perception went beyond war and expanded into Renny’s view of life. War and capital punishment are blood wasted by order of the government.
Renny has been very influential at home, but most do not know about his impact in Asia.
Lin Hsin-yi (林欣怡), executive director of the TAEDP, met Renny in 2007 during the MVFHR’s “Victims, We Care” speech tour in Asia.
It was the group’s first of many tours in the region. The idea that there were victims’ families that do not support the death penalty shattered a lot of embedded beliefs in public opinion in Asia.
Renny demonstrated that there is not only one face for victims, there are many faces. No matter if Taiwan abolishes the death penalty now or, eventually, in the long run, Renny’s work conveyed that victims’ protection is important and should be a priority of any government.
His impact has influenced Taiwan’s judicial system. The concept of restorative justice in Taiwan started with a seed planted by Renny and has begun to bloom.
MVFHR codirector Kate Lowenstein’s collaboration and friendship with Renny grew from their shared commitment to making sure that those who were already harmed by murder were not further harmed by the systems and movements that were supposed to be supporting them.
When remarking on Renny, Kate said: “He was exhausting and wonderful, he was a pain in the ass, and the very very best of humanity. I will always wish I could be more like Renny.”
Renny has made the world a better place. His impact will continue to improve the lives of those to come. From New Hampshire to Japan and Taiwan, his absence will be felt. Thank you for all your hard work, Renny.
Maria Wilkinson is a research intern at the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS