Local media have reported that news clips in Public Television Service’s (PTS) digital library were accidentally deleted by an outsourced data storage company on Feb. 8. As many as 420,000 valuable clips were reportedly deleted and more than 84,000 of them cannot be restored.
In response, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) said that she was not only shocked, but also furious, as she did not expect that a level A agency like PTS would make such an amateur mistake. More importantly, she said that if no one had exposed the incident, it would have remained covered up forever.
“Is PTS trying to pretend that everything is fine?” she asked.
Wu said that she had been at a complete loss for how to respond when she found out about this “cultural catastrophe” and she severely condemned the agency responsible for the mishap, which had been kept under wraps until she received an anonymous message.
Surprisingly, the Ministry of Culture’s latest report to the legislature, which Wu read in detail, failed to even mention the incident. Nor did the ministry, which oversees PTS, take the initiative to make the incident public. Naturally, a review report about the case did not exist.
Wu’s anger is fully understandable. As she said, if no one had exposed the case, the public might never have found out about it, and there would have been no proof that it had happened at all.
Even more infuriating, what gave PTS the nerve to think that it could cover up this major information security flaw by itself? Who made this outrageous decision?
Similarly, another major information security flaw occurred when the Ministry of Education accidentally erased tens of thousands of “e-learning profiles” of high-school students in September last year. PTS failed to learn its lesson from that mistake.
According to the “cybersecurity responsibility levels” of the Cyber Security Management Act (資通安全管理法), the PTS Foundation is a level A agency, the highest level there is. Unfortunately, after making the lowest-level mistake, PTS adopted a negative attitude by trying to quietly “turn big problems into small ones, and small problems into no problems,” as the old Chinese saying goes.
It is necessary for the agency to explain and clarify the matter.
Hu Wen-chi is a former vice chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Culture and Communications Committee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS