The events in Ukraine have stimulated public debate in Taiwan about the threat of a Chinese invasion.
It is absurd that it would take events unfolding half a world away, and only now, to get this debate going. Of course, the debate has never gone away, although the political class often appears to have taken its eye off the ball.
A major reason that other nations have been willing to come to Ukraine’s aid is the resolve its armed forces — and particularly its military reservists and citizens who have taken up arms — have shown in fighting the aggressor. Taiwanese would also need to show a willingness to fight if the US and other allies are expected to come to Taiwan’s aid.
This is true, but it must go beyond the optics, and while changes to the reservist system and debate about extending conscription from four months to one year are important, they beg the question of why this is only happening now.
In 2019, retired US Marine Corps colonel Grant Newsham came to Taiwan to evaluate the nation’s defense capabilities and concluded that there was a solid core of well-trained troops and excellent officers, but that the military reserve system was in chaos.
In January, the Ministry of National Defense established the All-out Defense Mobilization Agency to reform the reservist system: The first batch of 400 aspiring reservists reported for duty on March 5 for two weeks of intensive weapons firing and maintenance, disaster prevention and the legal aspects of military training.
While it appears that the government is moving in the right direction, it was a trial run, involving about 15,000 reservists, with the program to be continued in the second and third quarters and then reviewed in the fourth. That is, a whole year is to pass before the new program — which arguably is only marginally better than the current one — is to be evaluated.
The government and the agency must be more ambitious with the overhaul of the reserve system, and do it with a greater sense of urgency. This should involve not only increasing the frequency, duration and quality of training sessions, but also have reservists joining drills with the standing army, to ensure maximum operational cohesion.
Taiwan’s standing army is supplemented by mandatory conscription, but the length of compulsory service has since 2000, mostly under former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), been gradually reduced to four months. It is only now, in President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) sixth year in office, that reverting the duration to one year is being considered.
Again, the question is how much longer the government is to drag its feet? Surely, neither the government nor the ministry need more time to work out what needs to be done.
The quality of the training — whether the duration is four months or one year — is another aspect that has gone unaddressed for far too long: Many young men say their reluctance to do military service is due to the perception that it is a waste of time — stories of pushing pens and pulling up weeds instead of proper training — not because of their unwillingness to fight for their country.
Having a civilian force, providing training for volunteers willing to defend Taiwan in the same vein as what is happening in Ukraine is another option the government could consider. This does not mean waiting for the unthinkable to happen, and then placing guns in people’s hands and wishing them the best of luck: A systematic and comprehensive training program must be developed.
If the government is to learn from Ukraine’s example, it will need to get ahead of the curve, and do so fast.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS