The government this month introduced a new reservist training program — all reservists are to train for about 10 hours per day, which includes a two-hour, 10km nighttime combat march, for a total of 136 hours over 14 days — with the goal of improving combat readiness and maintaining reservist forces.
While the law stipulates that “volunteer enlisted soldiers” are subject to reservist management when “suspended from active service, retired or lifted from mobilization,” only male personnel are required to become reservists and participate in regular training sessions.
Even though the same regulation extends to female personnel, they can choose whether to be part of a reservist force after retirement. The Ministry of National Defense has yet to mobilize female personnel to report back to camp to participate in the reservist training program, having said that there is a sufficient force of male personnel.
Taiwan became a popular keyword on Twitter after Russia invaded Ukraine, as the world is concerned whether Taiwan could become the next center of conflict.
The ministry’s newly devised defense plan is forged in the spirit of defense autonomy and public participation, and centers on the defense of the national army.
Since the war erupted in Ukraine, Ukrainians — regardless of gender — have demonstrated a determination to engage in national defense. Ukraine’s example has highlighted the importance of reforming Taiwan’s reservist program.
As female volunteer soldiers have received the same military training and learned the same tactics and strategies as their male counterparts, it would be a shame not to utilize them.
By not having equal participation by women in the reservist training program, the government is wasting the social resources that have been poured into training these women and passing up the opportunity for military combat training.
To reform, the government should first review the Act of Military Service for Officers and Non-commissioned Officers of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍軍官士官服役條例) and related laws. To strengthen public national defense, the government should start by realizing gender equality in its reservist program, and modifying the approach of determining a person’s duties according to their gender.
It is high time this issue was addressed with some real action and planning.
Chang Ting-kuo is a freelance writer and has a master’s degree in law.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not