That Washington has not sent troops to Ukraine to directly intervene in the Russian invasion has led some Taiwanese to doubt whether the US would defend Taiwan were China to attack.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has even said that the US would send weapons, but not troops, were a war to occur across the Taiwan Strait.
At a sensitive time like this, US President Joe Biden appointed former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen to lead a delegation to Taiwan to express Washington’s support.
The US does not fire back in international wars instantly as it does in defense of its homeland, preferring to contain escalation of overseas conflict through diplomacy and policy maneuvers. It is unlikely to put boots on the ground until a war develops to an extent that such action is required.
Before entering World War II, the US merely passed the Lend-Lease Act in 1941 to help the Allies obtain military supplies and equipment, while weakening Axis members through embargoes.
After Iraq invaded Kuwait in the 1990 Gulf War, Washington first pushed the UN Security Council to pass resolutions 660 and 661, joined the League of Arab States in condemning Iraq and imposed economic sanctions on Baghdad.
It launched operation Desert Shield to station troops in Saudi Arabia to prevent Iraq from invading other allies.
After the UN passed Resolution 678, authorizing the use of force, the US launched operation Desert Storm with coalition forces in 1991.
Between Aug. 2, 1990 and Jan. 15, 1991, the US military operation had prioritized defending its allies. Similarly, in the first few weeks of the Russia-Ukraine war, the US’ main strategy has been to defend its NATO allies.
However, with the US Air Force’s Global Hawk drones gathering intelligence and US$350 million in military aid from Washington combined with weapons and supplies offered by other nations, as well as volunteers pouring in to fight for Ukraine, it is clear that a compound warfare approach incorporating concepts from the Lend-Lease Act is under way.
Moreover, the US military has trained Ukrainian special forces to operate US-supplied weapons such as Javelin and Stinger missiles.
The operational patterns indirectly reveal a new type of military cooperation called cooperative security location, a US term for outposts and facilities used for regional training. This means that the US does not need to participate in battles, nor does it need to deploy troops to provide military support.
Ukraine is not a NATO member, so the US military is unable to directly intervene.
However, the US Taiwan Relations Act and the US-Japan security treaty provide the legal basis for Washington, Tokyo and other allies to directly intervene were a cross-strait war to occur.
In addition, the US military has been training Taiwanese special forces for years, and has extended military cooperation from standing forces to reserve forces through the US Department of Defense’s State Partnership Program.
Were war to break out between Taiwan and China, Washington would be able to follow the model of late US lieutenant general Claire Chennault, who commanded the Flying Tigers, a group of US volunteer fighter pilots formed in 1941 to help oppose the Japanese invasion of China.
If war should break out and the US not send troops to Taiwan immediately, there is no reason for pessimism as long as Taiwanese remain united.
Ou Wei-chun is chief legal officer of a private company.
Translated Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS