That Washington has not sent troops to Ukraine to directly intervene in the Russian invasion has led some Taiwanese to doubt whether the US would defend Taiwan were China to attack.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has even said that the US would send weapons, but not troops, were a war to occur across the Taiwan Strait.
At a sensitive time like this, US President Joe Biden appointed former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen to lead a delegation to Taiwan to express Washington’s support.
The US does not fire back in international wars instantly as it does in defense of its homeland, preferring to contain escalation of overseas conflict through diplomacy and policy maneuvers. It is unlikely to put boots on the ground until a war develops to an extent that such action is required.
Before entering World War II, the US merely passed the Lend-Lease Act in 1941 to help the Allies obtain military supplies and equipment, while weakening Axis members through embargoes.
After Iraq invaded Kuwait in the 1990 Gulf War, Washington first pushed the UN Security Council to pass resolutions 660 and 661, joined the League of Arab States in condemning Iraq and imposed economic sanctions on Baghdad.
It launched operation Desert Shield to station troops in Saudi Arabia to prevent Iraq from invading other allies.
After the UN passed Resolution 678, authorizing the use of force, the US launched operation Desert Storm with coalition forces in 1991.
Between Aug. 2, 1990 and Jan. 15, 1991, the US military operation had prioritized defending its allies. Similarly, in the first few weeks of the Russia-Ukraine war, the US’ main strategy has been to defend its NATO allies.
However, with the US Air Force’s Global Hawk drones gathering intelligence and US$350 million in military aid from Washington combined with weapons and supplies offered by other nations, as well as volunteers pouring in to fight for Ukraine, it is clear that a compound warfare approach incorporating concepts from the Lend-Lease Act is under way.
Moreover, the US military has trained Ukrainian special forces to operate US-supplied weapons such as Javelin and Stinger missiles.
The operational patterns indirectly reveal a new type of military cooperation called cooperative security location, a US term for outposts and facilities used for regional training. This means that the US does not need to participate in battles, nor does it need to deploy troops to provide military support.
Ukraine is not a NATO member, so the US military is unable to directly intervene.
However, the US Taiwan Relations Act and the US-Japan security treaty provide the legal basis for Washington, Tokyo and other allies to directly intervene were a cross-strait war to occur.
In addition, the US military has been training Taiwanese special forces for years, and has extended military cooperation from standing forces to reserve forces through the US Department of Defense’s State Partnership Program.
Were war to break out between Taiwan and China, Washington would be able to follow the model of late US lieutenant general Claire Chennault, who commanded the Flying Tigers, a group of US volunteer fighter pilots formed in 1941 to help oppose the Japanese invasion of China.
If war should break out and the US not send troops to Taiwan immediately, there is no reason for pessimism as long as Taiwanese remain united.
Ou Wei-chun is chief legal officer of a private company.
Translated Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS