Seventy years of occupation
In 1950, when the People’s Republic of China invaded Tibet under the pretext of “peaceful liberation,” the Tibetan people were completely taken by surprise, and we were not prepared to defend ourselves. At that time no country came to our rescue, as we had no links with the outside world.
Today China is celebrating 70 years of the “peaceful liberation” of Tibet. Over a 100,000 Tibetans died defending their country. One million Tibetans perished in the past seventy years.
What has China got to show after 70 years of occupation?
Tibetans in Tibet hate the Chinese, and likewise Tibetan cadres are not trusted by the Chinese and are treated as second-class citizens.
No religious freedom, absolutely no freedom of speech or movement. No Tibetan in the past 10 years has been able to get a Chinese passport. No Tibetan can travel to China without being questioned.
Why should Tibet be a part of China? Tibetans deserve the right to choose their own destiny. Tibet is now being flooded with Han Chinese settlers making Tibetans a minority in the big cities such as Lhasa and Shigatse.
What the Chinese have accomplished is the systematic degradation of Tibetan culture to the point where the Tibetan people are completely subservient to China.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) recently visited Tibet to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the 17 Point Agreement and the “peaceful liberation” of Tibet.
However, during the entire visit and in all his talks, there was no mention of the 17 Point Agreement, not much talk of “peaceful,” but only of “liberation.”
However, his visit itself during this tense situation and his high-profile meetings with the military in Tibet certainly showed China’s commitment to the defense of their strategic interest in Tibet.
After 70 years of occupation, Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Yang (汪洋) on a visit to Tibet called on Tibetans to accept Chinese Communist Party rule.
Beijing has lost the race to control the minds of the Tibetan people, and it feels unsure of its control.
In the minds of the Tibetan people lies the spirit of the Dalai Lama. No Tibetan can be coerced to change their strong traditional religious beliefs. Beijing is trying to raise the image of their appointed Panchen Lama in front of the Tibetan people, thinking that one day he will be able to replace the Dalai Lama.
This strategy will not work, as the Tibetan people will never accept him.
Seventy years of occupation has turned out to be a futile exercise for China, as it has failed to win the hearts and minds of the Tibetan people.
Khedroob Thondup
Former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS