The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on Feb. 17 released salary data for counties and cities for the first time, which found that Hsinchu City in 2020 had the highest average annual salary at NT$972,000. Taipei was second with NT$863,000 and Hsinchu County third with NT$858,000. Changhua County had the lowest average annual salary at NT$518,000, while Pingtung County was the second-lowest with NT$535,000 and Penghu County the third-lowest with NT$544,000.
The DGBAS said that high salaries in Hsinchu City and Hsinchu County were driven mainly by technology companies that have a large number of highly paid professionals working in and around the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區). Taipei benefited from financial and insurance companies, and being home to several corporate headquarters. As for Changhua, Pingtung and Penghu, they are the nation’s least industrialized counties and attract fewer business opportunities, the DGBAS said.
The 2020 salary data also revealed some interesting facts. Salaries in Taoyuan were higher than in New Taipei City. Despite the considerably lower cost of living, Taoyuan’s average annual salary of NT$677,000, the nation’s fourth-highest, was higher than the more costly New Taipei City’s NT$637,000, the sixth-highest.
Taichung’s average was NT$591,000, placing it last among the nation’s six special municipalities. Kaohsiung was eighth overall with NT$619,000, while Tainan was ninth with NT$613,000.
Salaries in Miaoli County, the fifth-highest at NT$640,000, and Keelung, the seventh-highest at NT$621,000, were higher than in Kaohsiung and Tainan, even though they are less densely populated than the two big cities.
Ten counties and cities posted salaries of less than NT$600,000 per year on average. Among them were Chiayi City, and Chiayi, Hualien, Nantou, Yilan and Taitung counties.
The DGBAS said the salary statistics reflect the economic and industrial structure of each county and city. As high-paying industries develop — such as in the high-tech, financial, insurance and medical sectors — average salaries increase. It is undeniable that employees in such industries receive relatively good starting salaries, but they also face more pressure regarding rising living costs, and a higher risk of layoffs or salary cuts, as was seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
What needs further observation is whether Taiwan is moving into an M-shaped society at an accelerating pace, whether consumer purchasing power is becoming polarized as the economy grows and if the income gap between more and less-developed regions is continuing to widen.
What also deserves attention is that higher salaries in the Hsinchu area indicate a growing number of high-income earners in the information and communications technology sector, especially the semiconductor industry. The magnetic pull of these firms extracts talent from other regions and economic sectors.
For instance, as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co expands its operations in Taiwan and overseas, it has in three years attracted more than 10,000 employees with backgrounds in science and technology. Last week, the Taiwan Association of Machinery Industry called on the government to respond to its sector’s loss of talent to the semiconductor and electronics industries, leaving manufacturing firms facing a significant shortage of workers at a time when they require more labor to meet market demand.
Taiwan faces not only a shortage of talent in a variety of sectors, but also imbalanced development in the nation’s industrial structure — an issue that demands swift government action.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS