The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) on Friday said that it would pay the costs of accommodation for people who were identified as close contacts of a COVID-19 case and placed under isolation between Dec. 14 last year and Friday.
Many people had complained that they had to pay from NT$2,000 to NT$3,000 per night for 14-day mandatory self-isolation at a designated disease prevention hotel.
More than 10,000 people have been placed under isolation since the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 began spreading in Taiwan last month.
Many people said they were identified as close contacts simply for dining in a restaurant, visiting a medical clinic or being at any number of sites at about the same time as a confirmed case. They said they were given no option but to isolate at a hotel at their own expense.
Taipei and Kaohsiung last month reassured their residents that the cost of compulsory hotel quarantine would be covered by the local governments. Taoyuan and Taichung said this month that they would also pay the costs, but some local governments only offered partial subsidies for hotel isolation.
Among those affected was a woman in Hsinchu who ate at a Japanese restaurant which a confirmed COVID-19 case had also visited at about the same time. She had to quarantine at a hotel, which cost her NT$33,800, despite having a single bedroom at home suitable for isolation.
A YouTuber uploaded a video during hotel isolation, saying that his house had an entire floor in which he could isolate, but the Pingtung County Government only allowed him to stay at a designated hotel at a personal cost of NT$32,000. That amount constitutes a monthly salary for many people, not to mention the salary lost during quarantine.
Such reports have led to public criticism that self-paid hotel isolation discourages people from scanning the contact tracing QR codes at restaurants, stores and public venues, as it feels as though only the people who comply with the rules are “punished” by the measures, and that it is unfair for residents of different cities and counties to be treated unequally.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the CECC, on Monday said that people would not be placed under isolation “just because they visited the same place at the same time” as confirmed cases, and that close contacts are identified by experts after contact tracing.
He said that generally people would be asked to isolate in a single bedroom with its own bathroom at home, and if they are linked to a special high-risk cluster, or if the local government assessed their room as unsuitable, a centralized quarantine facility paid for by the government would be offered.
If local governments have other reasons to expand close contact identification and force people to isolate in hotels, they must explain the reasons or bear the cost, he said. However, stories of compulsory self-paid isolation continue to be reported.
Chen on Friday said that the center would pay the mandatory isolation costs for about 6,000 people, but local governments must follow national rules on quarantine measures from now on.
This is not the only policy gap regarding COVID-19 prevention measures. For instance, Tainan imposes fines on people who fail to scan contact-tracing QR codes. Meanwhile, the CECC bans restaurants from providing dine-in services if it is determined that they have failed to follow contact registration rules, but has no penalty for patrons who do not use the system.
The CECC seems to have resolved this issue, but it is important that the government establish a mechanism for the affected people to apply for and receive compensation, and to ensure that local governments comply with national rules.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking