While everyone is talking about the Beijing Winter Olympics, China’s implementation of the digital yuan deserves greater attention from Taiwanese.
App stores last week made the digital yuan payment app available to Taiwanese smartphone users, enabling them to use it in traditional and simplified Chinese, as well as English.
Does the app contravene Taiwan’s national currency laws?
The issue is worthy of discussion, and countermeasures might be necessary.
The government’s policy is that local businesses allowing Chinese tourists to make purchases with yuan should be punished for breaching national currency laws.
If stores accept payments via WeChat Pay or Alipay, transactions must be denominated in New Taiwan dollars and processed by local banks under the supervision of the nation’s monitoring mechanism, which also applies to local eWallet apps.
Given the government’s tough stance on private Chinese eWallet apps, can it sit back and watch the Chinese government-run digital yuan enter Taiwan?
This is not a problem for Taiwan only. In coordination with the Winter Olympics, Beijing’s digital yuan app has gone overseas and is downloadable on smartphones everywhere in the world.
China said that its aim is to make the convenient payment tool available to all teams at the Games, but its broader strategic intent seems to be the internationalization of the digital currency.
To realize this goal, China originally planned to only accept digital yuan payments at Olympic venues, hotels, transportation, restaurants, department stores and each and every adjacent place, banning eWallet giants WeChat Pay and Alipay, and forcing foreign participants to use digital yuan.
After the plan caused controversy, Beijing reversed course, and also allowed Visa and cash payments.
However, China made it easy for foreigners to use the digital currency by introducing simplified procedures, and offered incentives and subsidies for its use, hoping that they would continue using digital yuan after returning to their home countries.
China has over the past few years tried every way to boost its currency’s international status to challenge the hegemony of the US dollar.
Beijing says that in the event of a foreign exchange blockade imposed by the US and Europe, it would still be able to trade internationally using digital yuan.
The digital yuan is knocking on Taiwan’s door. The National Communications Commission should evaluate whether app stores can legally offer the digital yuan payment app in Taiwan.
The central bank should also prepare countermeasures to follow up on the issue.
Honda Chen is a research fellow at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS