For professionals whose entire job requires good communication, politicians can be an especially tone-deaf bunch. Or perhaps their blunders are symptomatic of who has their ear, which, more often than not, correlates with who has the most money.
On Monday last week, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Ou-po (陳歐珀) caused a stir by suggesting that Yilan County’s Turtle Island (Gueishan Island, 龜山島) and nearby areas be developed into an international tourist destination.
Sandwiched in the middle of a Facebook post discussing legislative progress and the battery industry, Chen threw in the idea of building a hotel on the uninhabited island using a build-operate-transfer model.
Media jumped on the idea, forcing a response later that day from Chen, who doubled down on his view that the area should be developed “provided that the development does not compromise the environment or ecosystem.”
Yet the story has held interest in the media and online, drawing another defense on Sunday. Repeatedly emphasizing the importance of sustainability and low density, Chen said that he was not calling for large-scale development, but merely floating an idea to consider as a way to realize the potential of Taiwan’s world-class natural attractions.
There is no reason to disbelieve Chen’s intentions, but his suggestion has clearly struck a nerve.
People have been clamoring to go to Turtle Island since it was reopened to the public in 2000, after being used by the military for 23 years, but the Northeast and Yilan Coast National Scenic Area Administration has been careful to implement strict ecological controls. Daily visitor numbers are limited and monitored through coast guard patrols, although the cap has steadily risen from 250 in 2000 to 1,800 today. No one is allowed to stay overnight, and only part of the island is open to tourists, while ferries and tour operators are trained in conservation practices.
Especially when compared with another popular offshore tourist destination, these efforts should be lauded. Pingtung County’s Siaoliouciou Island (小琉球) — just a 30-minute boat ride from the main island — once had some of the healthiest coral reefs in the nation, but now environmentalists say the surrounding seabed is “barren” due partly to poor tourism practices.
Also about 30 minutes from shore, Turtle Island is home to a stunning diversity of rare species, including at least 16 types of cetaceans and the endemic Formosan lily. It is also a habitat of the Formosan flying fox, the only one of three habitats in Taiwan that has seen a steady increase in population since 2010, even as it opens to ever greater numbers of tourists.
The approach is clearly working. Input from environmentalists and stakeholders are taken into account to balance their needs. The scenic area administration even addressed the development issue in a prior report, stating that large-scale construction does not fit with its conservationist goals, even if last week it said that it has not yet evaluated the possibility of building a hotel.
At the same time, Chen is offering nothing but buzzwords to support his argument. His logic jumps from globalization to tourism growth to building a hotel, without asking whether the industry would be best served by another “international-grade” facility, while the east coast remains dotted with failed hotels and resorts.
It would take far more creativity to help the area live up to its potential as a world-class travel destination, but the best Chen can come up with is to parrot the desires of developers. No wonder people are disappointed.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS