Most schools across Taiwan reopened for the new semester as planned on Friday, despite concerns about the local spread of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Only Kaohsiung and Taoyuan postponed reopening preschools to tomorrow, and Kaohsiung on Thursday announced that elementary schools would delay their start to tomorrow as well, due to concerns over a few local cluster infections.
Among the six special municipalities, five have announced that schools would be closed for 14 days if a faculty member or student is diagnosed with COVID-19, a stricter standard than the Ministry of Education’s guidelines.
Keelung, Hsinchu City, Hsinchu County and Yunlin have also adopted stricter standards.
The ministry’s guidelines state that a class in which a faculty member or student is diagnosed with COVID-19 should be suspended for 14 days; the entire school should be closed for two weeks if it has two or more faculty members or students confirmed with COVID-19; and schools with any confirmed cases should suspend all major events.
Local media have cited health experts expressing different views, including that the ministry’s guidelines were carefully discussed and took into consideration the effect on students and their families, as parents might need to take unpaid disease prevention childcare leave, and that the ranges of class suspensions could be decided based on testing and contact tracing.
The WHO’s Regional Office for Europe in October last year called for schools to stay open, and use disease prevention and response measures, saying school closures the year before had disrupted the education of millions of students and did more harm than good, especially to children’s mental health and social well-being.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC), said that suspending an entire school for two weeks would be “too harsh.”
The education ministry on Thursday said it respects the local governments’ enhanced disease prevention measures, but “suspending classes should not mean suspending education.” Schools must prepare for remote learning or make up missed lessons on weekends or after school.
The inconsistent policies among local governments can be confusing to the public, especially when their own policies reflect conflicting values.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Wednesday said that more than 400 people were ordered to isolate due to one confirmed case, and only one case of moderately severe COVID-19 was reported in Taiwan this year. However, more than 20,000 people have been placed in isolation. Ko wondered if the social costs are bearable.
He suggested that aside from disease prevention, the need for social relief, economic stimulus and transformation must be considered, and restrictions should be loosened for people who have been vaccinated. Therefore, the city is to start easing restrictions, including allowing school field trips and graduation trips, from Tuesday if COVID-19 remains under control.
The city government’s attitude seems ambiguous, as it calls for eased restrictions to reduce the enormous social costs from contact tracing and isolation despite its tighter school suspension standard.
While the CECC said that domestic restrictions and border controls could be loosened as soon as next month, it is important for government agencies to make consistent decisions based on scientific data and evidence, while communicating and reassuring the public about changes through clear messaging, rather than leaving them more anxious and confused.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS