China has announced two new measures for Internet management.
The first is a revised regulation for cybersecurity review that is to take effect on Tuesday and require Internet companies holding the data of more than 1 million users to undergo a network security review before they can list overseas. The regulation also applies to companies that “affect or may affect national security.”
The threshold is not high — almost all Chinese Internet companies that are capable of going public overseas have more than 1 million users.
Moreover, as the new regulation does not specify whether it also applies retroactively, it will increase the uncertainty Internet companies face when developing their business.
It is also unclear to which other companies that process user data, but remain below the threshold, the regulation applies, as it does not define what “affecting national security” means.
The regulation lists key factors for evaluation, but based on China’s poor record in law enforcement, it leaves a lot of space for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to clamp down on Internet companies at will.
The other new measure, to take effect on March 1, is to govern the way technology companies can use recommendation algorithms and requires algorithm-based service providers to “adhere to mainstream values, actively disseminate positive energy, and to not use algorithms to engage in illegal activities or disseminate illegal information.”
Algorithms are one of the most widely used artificial intelligence technologies.
Many countries have scruples about supervising the highly complex algorithms, as it is difficult to predict how state intervention would affect the technology sector’s innovative potential. China “leads” the world in stipulating such a law, which might do more harm than good.
The biggest effect on companies would probably not be the fines imposed for breaching the regulation, but investigations as to whether a breach has occurred, with the CCP potentially accessing the source code of the algorithms that are critical to business secrets.
That chilling effect would inevitably kill the incentive for enterprises to innovate.
The regulation requires that companies’ Web sites, featured pieces, trending articles and pop-up windows “actively present content that conforms to mainstream values,” but it does not specify what it means by “positive energy” or “mainstream values,” giving the CCP greater control over public opinion on the Internet.
It essentially stamps the CCP’s mark firmly on the algorithms of Chinese private enterprises.
Intimidation is an important means for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to consolidate power. In the past few years, the CCP has reinforced its propaganda about the threat the West allegedly poses to China, coupled with stipulating lots of Internet and investment regulations, to ensure that anyone or anything considered unfavorable to the CCP regime would be suppressed and controlled in the name of “national security” and to counteract “infiltration by Western forces.”
This is the way the CCP suppresses unfavorable political opinions at the smallest cost possible. It might be effective in the short term, but in the long term, it might suppress and limit social development and business innovation, and damage China’s investment environment, gradually eroding the very foundation of the CCP’s power base.
Kung Hsien-tai is director of the ethics department of Taiwan Financial Holdings.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
The Russian city of Vladivostok lies approximately 45km from the Sino-Russian border on the Sea of Japan. The area was not always Russian territory: It was once the site of a Chinese settlement. The settlement would later be known as Yongmingcheng (永明城), the “city of eternal light,” during the Yuan Dynasty. That light was extinguished in 1858 when a large area of land was ceded by the Qing Dynasty to the Russian Empire with the signing of the Treaty of Aigun. The People’s Republic of China founded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never ruled Taiwan. Taiwan was governed by the
RSS