China has announced two new measures for Internet management.
The first is a revised regulation for cybersecurity review that is to take effect on Tuesday and require Internet companies holding the data of more than 1 million users to undergo a network security review before they can list overseas. The regulation also applies to companies that “affect or may affect national security.”
The threshold is not high — almost all Chinese Internet companies that are capable of going public overseas have more than 1 million users.
Moreover, as the new regulation does not specify whether it also applies retroactively, it will increase the uncertainty Internet companies face when developing their business.
It is also unclear to which other companies that process user data, but remain below the threshold, the regulation applies, as it does not define what “affecting national security” means.
The regulation lists key factors for evaluation, but based on China’s poor record in law enforcement, it leaves a lot of space for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to clamp down on Internet companies at will.
The other new measure, to take effect on March 1, is to govern the way technology companies can use recommendation algorithms and requires algorithm-based service providers to “adhere to mainstream values, actively disseminate positive energy, and to not use algorithms to engage in illegal activities or disseminate illegal information.”
Algorithms are one of the most widely used artificial intelligence technologies.
Many countries have scruples about supervising the highly complex algorithms, as it is difficult to predict how state intervention would affect the technology sector’s innovative potential. China “leads” the world in stipulating such a law, which might do more harm than good.
The biggest effect on companies would probably not be the fines imposed for breaching the regulation, but investigations as to whether a breach has occurred, with the CCP potentially accessing the source code of the algorithms that are critical to business secrets.
That chilling effect would inevitably kill the incentive for enterprises to innovate.
The regulation requires that companies’ Web sites, featured pieces, trending articles and pop-up windows “actively present content that conforms to mainstream values,” but it does not specify what it means by “positive energy” or “mainstream values,” giving the CCP greater control over public opinion on the Internet.
It essentially stamps the CCP’s mark firmly on the algorithms of Chinese private enterprises.
Intimidation is an important means for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to consolidate power. In the past few years, the CCP has reinforced its propaganda about the threat the West allegedly poses to China, coupled with stipulating lots of Internet and investment regulations, to ensure that anyone or anything considered unfavorable to the CCP regime would be suppressed and controlled in the name of “national security” and to counteract “infiltration by Western forces.”
This is the way the CCP suppresses unfavorable political opinions at the smallest cost possible. It might be effective in the short term, but in the long term, it might suppress and limit social development and business innovation, and damage China’s investment environment, gradually eroding the very foundation of the CCP’s power base.
Kung Hsien-tai is director of the ethics department of Taiwan Financial Holdings.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS