During the Lunar New Year holiday, many people were likely staring at their smartphones, trying to avoid being roped into an awkward conversation with relatives they do not really know.
Spending too much time browsing news on social media platforms or in instant messaging groups opens people of all generations up to “clickbait headlines.”
Clickbait articles often take advantage of human weaknesses by using sensational headlines that do not match news content to attract people to access their site, boosting network traffic.
Most of the time, the headlines and the content beneath them bear little resemblance to each other.
The most extreme cases are headlines that have almost nothing to do with the text; other headlines might describe an event in exaggerated terms.
There are also clickbait articles that appeal to human nature, with headlines designed to elicit fear or curiosity. Writers of such headlines employ a variety of tricks:
The first is to deliberately omit where the events in the report took place. This plays on a reader’s assumption that the story is about their own country. This might lure Taiwanese into a story about events that might be commonplace overseas, but would be interesting here due to cultural differences.
The second trick is to use sensationalist or violent words. The headline might use “slap” or “cyberriot,” but the article describes events that were far from a slap, while a cyberriot might just mean that people commented on the subject online, while the subject of the report is of little significance.
The third trick is to allude to the supernatural in headlines with the intention to evoke fear in the reader.
While prophecies are mostly unverifiable, they can prompt fear.
However, such articles are typically an insult to the intelligence of readers.
The fourth trick is to use a third-person pronoun instead of a name in headlines — for example: “He hit the nail on the head” — to arouse curiosity. A headline that replaces names with “he” or “she” is likely not a good source of information. A writer with a good reputation and high credibility would never produce such a headline. A similar trick is to substitute a noun with “this” or “these.”
If people need to avoid socializing with relatives, they would be better served by downloading an electronic book. Clickbait articles waste time and phone battery.
Chang Yueh-han is an assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS