During the Lunar New Year holiday, many people were likely staring at their smartphones, trying to avoid being roped into an awkward conversation with relatives they do not really know.
Spending too much time browsing news on social media platforms or in instant messaging groups opens people of all generations up to “clickbait headlines.”
Clickbait articles often take advantage of human weaknesses by using sensational headlines that do not match news content to attract people to access their site, boosting network traffic.
Most of the time, the headlines and the content beneath them bear little resemblance to each other.
The most extreme cases are headlines that have almost nothing to do with the text; other headlines might describe an event in exaggerated terms.
There are also clickbait articles that appeal to human nature, with headlines designed to elicit fear or curiosity. Writers of such headlines employ a variety of tricks:
The first is to deliberately omit where the events in the report took place. This plays on a reader’s assumption that the story is about their own country. This might lure Taiwanese into a story about events that might be commonplace overseas, but would be interesting here due to cultural differences.
The second trick is to use sensationalist or violent words. The headline might use “slap” or “cyberriot,” but the article describes events that were far from a slap, while a cyberriot might just mean that people commented on the subject online, while the subject of the report is of little significance.
The third trick is to allude to the supernatural in headlines with the intention to evoke fear in the reader.
While prophecies are mostly unverifiable, they can prompt fear.
However, such articles are typically an insult to the intelligence of readers.
The fourth trick is to use a third-person pronoun instead of a name in headlines — for example: “He hit the nail on the head” — to arouse curiosity. A headline that replaces names with “he” or “she” is likely not a good source of information. A writer with a good reputation and high credibility would never produce such a headline. A similar trick is to substitute a noun with “this” or “these.”
If people need to avoid socializing with relatives, they would be better served by downloading an electronic book. Clickbait articles waste time and phone battery.
Chang Yueh-han is an assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS